The aim of this investigation was to measure the
intelligibility of educated Nigerian speakers of English to
British listeners and to analyse the main causes of intelligibility
failure. The test material consisted of the following:
I- Connected Speech, II - Reading Passage, III -
Phonemes, IVA - Stress, IVB - Intonation. The speech of 24
Nigerian first-year university students - 12 Yoruba and 12
Hausa speakers - was recorded. An RP speaker was also recorded.
The-recordings were played to 240 British listeners, each
Nigerian speaker being assessed by 10 British listeners.
A scoring system was devised for the tests of
Connected Speech. The intelligibility scores ranged from
92.7% to 29.9%, with a mean score of 64.4%. The RP speaker's
score (based on all 240 listeners) was 99.4%. Listeners'
impressionistic judgements of the speakers' intelligibility
correlated closely with the scores obtained on Test I. The
most intelligible Nigerian speaker was 93% as efficient as
the RP speaker, the mean Nigerian speaker was 65% as efficient,
and the least intelligible Nigerian speaker 30% as efficient
as the RP speaker.
Test I- Connected Speech - was taken as the criterion
of fundamental importance in assessing intelligibility.
The other tests were regarded as subsidiary. - It was found
that Connected Speech was significantly correlated with Reading
and Stress, but not with the tests of Phonemes and
Intonation. Partial correlation analyses showed that stress
is the major component of all aspects of intelligibility.
The errors leading to intelligibility failure were
categorised into four groupings: - rhythmic/stress, segmental,
phonotactic, lexical/syntactic. Rhythmic/stress errors
(38.2% for all speakers) were the major cause of intelligibility
failure. This was closely followed by segmental errors (33.0%).
Phonotactic errors (20.00) were of lesser importance, while
lexical/syntactic errors (8.8%) were of minor importance.
Details of the actual phonetic errors are summarised in
Chapters 11-13. The study concludes with some observations
on the testing and teaching of oral English in the light of
these findings.
[1]
R. C. Abraham,et al.
The language of the Hausa people
,
1959
.
[2]
Ida C. Ward.
An Introduction To The Yoruba Language
,
1952
.
[3]
Ayọ Bamgboṣe,et al.
A grammar of Yoruba
,
1966
.
[4]
H. Lane.
Foreign Accent and Speech Distortion
,
1962
.
[5]
Peter Strevens,et al.
The Linguistic Sciences And Language Teaching
,
1967
.
[6]
C. F. Hockett.
A Course in Modern Linguistics
,
1959
.
[7]
George A. Miller,et al.
Language and Communication
,
1951
.
[8]
Congress of Phonetic Sciences
,
2022,
Nature.
[9]
Giles Wilkeson Gray,et al.
The bases of speech
,
1959
.
[10]
Nancy P. Hickerson,et al.
Testing Procedures for Estimating Transfer of Information among Iroquois Dialects and Languages
,
1952,
International Journal of American Linguistics.
[11]
P. Strevens.
Papers in Language and Language Teaching
,
1965
.
[12]
James S. Coleman,et al.
Nigeria: Background to Nationalism
,
1959
.
[13]
D. L. Richards,et al.
Assessment of speech communication links
,
1959
.
[14]
Bertil Malmberg.
Structural Linguistics and Human Communication: An Introduction into the Mechanism of Language and the Methodology of Linguistics
,
1967
.
[15]
G. A. Miller,et al.
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants
,
1955
.
[16]
G. E. Peterson,et al.
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
,
1951
.