Evaluation of operational strategies to minimize gas supersaturation downstream of a dam

Abstract Bubble dissolution downstream of spillways may create zones of high total dissolved gas (TDG) concentration, which can be detrimental to fish. This paper presents the use of a numerical model to identify dam operational strategies that mitigate elevated TDG production. A mixture model takes into account the effect of the bubbles on the hydrodynamics. The model calculates bubble dissolution considering bubble size change due to dissolution and pressure. The model is validated using field velocity and TDG data. Several simulations are performed to understand the physical phenomena leading to supersaturated water under different operational configurations. According to the model, concentrating the spillway flow in one bay causes bubbles to travel closer to the free surface and thus lower TDG production and more degasification. In order to obtain the lowest TDG concentration, it is best to concentrate most of the flow in a central spillway bay. If additional water needs to be spilled, the use of a western bay is recommended. An additional simulation using compliance conditions indicates that, using the proposed configuration, the dam meets TDG water quality standards. Moreover, statistical analysis performed on inert particles released in the spillway and turbines demonstrates that, after 2 h, 83.9% of the time particles are exposed to TDG values lower than 110%. If hydrostatic compensation is considered, particles are in undersaturated water 70% of the time.

[1]  S. A. Morsi,et al.  An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  M. Manninen,et al.  On the mixture model for multiphase flow , 1996 .

[3]  P. Carrica,et al.  Water entrainment due to spillway surface jets , 2007 .

[4]  A. Maule,et al.  Acute exposure to gas‐supersaturated water does not affect reproductive success of female adult chinook salmon late in maturation , 2004 .

[5]  Pablo M. Carrica,et al.  A multidimensional two-phase flow model for the total dissolved gas downstream of spillways , 2007 .

[6]  J. Gulliver,et al.  Modeling Total Dissolved Gas Concentration Downstream of Spillways , 2008 .

[7]  Earl M. Dawley,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Supersaturated Dissolved Gas on Resident Aquatic Biota in the Main-Stem Snake and Columbia Rivers , 2000 .

[8]  Pablo M. Carrica,et al.  A multiphase model for the hydrodynamics and total dissolved gas in tailraces , 2009 .

[9]  M. Richmond,et al.  Estimating adult Chinook salmon exposure to dissolved gas supersaturation downstream of hydroelectric dams using telemetry and hydrodynamic models , 2007 .

[10]  Don E. Weitkamp,et al.  A Review of Dissolved Gas Supersaturation Literature , 1980 .

[11]  A. Evans,et al.  Gas Bubble Trauma Incidence in Adult Salmonids in the Columbia River Basin , 2002 .

[12]  Earl M. Dawley,et al.  Effects of Supersaturate d Dissolved Atmospheric Gases on Northern Squawfish, Ptychocheilus oregonensis , 1981 .

[13]  David E. Hibbs,et al.  Prediction of Effective Saturation Concentration at Spillway Plunge Pools , 1997 .

[14]  D. A. Venditti,et al.  Gas bubble disease in resident fish below Grand Coulee Dam , 2001 .

[15]  John S. Gulliver,et al.  Modeling Dissolved Gas Supersaturation Below Spillway Plunge Pools , 1998 .

[16]  H. Lawrence Clever,et al.  The Solubility of Gases in Liquids , 1966 .