An Inversion-Free Predictive Controller for Piezoelectric Actuators Based on a Dynamic Linearized Neural Network Model

Piezoelectric actuators (PEAs) are widely used in high-precision positioning applications. However, the inherent hysteresis nonlinearity seriously deteriorates the tracking performance of PEAs. To deal with it, the compensation of the hysteresis by using its inverse model (called inversion-based) is the popular method in the literature. One major disadvantage of this method is that the tracking performance of PEAs highly relies on its inverse model. Meanwhile, the computational burden of obtaining the inverse model is overwhelming. In addition, the physical constraints of the input voltage of PEAs is hardly handled by the inversion-based method. This paper proposes an inversion-free predictive controller, which is based on a dynamic linearized multilayer feedforward neural network (MFNN) model. By the proposed method, the inverse model of the inherent hysteresis is not required, and the control law can be obtained in an explicit form. By using the technique of constrained quadratic programming, the proposed method still works well when dealing with the physical constraints of PEAs. Moreover, an error compensation term is introduced to reduce the steady-state error if the dynamic linearized MFNN cannot approximate the PEA's dynamical model satisfactorily. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, experiments are conducted on a commercial PEA. The experiment results show that the proposed method has a satisfactory tracking performance even with high-frequency references. Comparisons demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms some existing results.

[1]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Neural Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems: A Practitioner’s Handbook , 2000 .

[2]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Compensation of Scanner Creep and Hysteresis for AFM Nanomanipulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[3]  Y. Cao,et al.  A Novel Discrete ARMA-Based Model for Piezoelectric Actuator Hysteresis , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Lining Sun,et al.  A hysteresis compensation method of piezoelectric actuator: Model, identification and control , 2009 .

[5]  Guo-Ping Liu,et al.  Advanced controller design for aircraft gas turbine engines , 2005 .

[6]  Piotr Tatjewski,et al.  Advanced Control of Industrial Processes: Structures and Algorithms , 2006 .

[7]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Iterative Control Approach to Compensate for Both the Hysteresis and the Dynamics Effects of Piezo Actuators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Bum-Jae You,et al.  A piezoelectric actuator with a motion-decoupling amplifier for optical disk drives , 2010 .

[9]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Modeling hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators using NARMAX models , 2009 .

[10]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Iterative control of dynamics-coupling-caused errors in piezoscanners during high-speed AFM operation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Hwee Choo Liaw,et al.  Neural Network Motion Tracking Control of Piezo-Actuated Flexure-Based Mechanisms for Micro-/Nanomanipulation , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  Qingsong Xu Digital Sliding-Mode Control of Piezoelectric Micropositioning System Based on Input–Output Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Maciej Lawrynczuk Computationally Efficient Model Predictive Control Algorithms: A Neural Network Approach , 2014 .

[14]  M Verhaegen,et al.  Extracting hysteresis from nonlinear measurement of wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics system. , 2009, Optics letters.

[15]  Wei Li,et al.  A Monolithic Self-Sensing Precision Stage: Design, Modeling, Calibration, and Hysteresis Compensation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Adaptive Sliding Mode Control With Perturbation Estimation and PID Sliding Surface for Motion Tracking of a Piezo-Driven Micromanipulator , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Amir Khajepour,et al.  Stability and robust position control of hysteretic systems , 2010 .

[18]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Feedback-Linearized Inverse Feedforward for Creep, Hysteresis, and Vibration Compensation in AFM Piezoactuators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[19]  R. Ben Mrad,et al.  On the classical Preisach model for hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators , 2003 .

[20]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Sliding‐mode control of a three‐degrees‐of‐freedom nanopositioner , 2008 .

[21]  Maciej Ławryńczuk,et al.  Computationally Efficient Model Predictive Control Algorithms , 2014 .

[22]  Klaus Kuhnen,et al.  Modeling, Identification and Compensation of Complex Hysteretic Nonlinearities: A Modified Prandtl - Ishlinskii Approach , 2003, Eur. J. Control.

[23]  J. Sjöberg Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems: M. Nørgaard, O. Ravn, N. K. Poulsen and L. K. Hansen. Springer-Verlag, London Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, pp. xiv+246 , 2004 .

[24]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Design and Computational Optimization of a Decoupled 2-DOF Monolithic Mechanism , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Yanling Tian,et al.  A Novel Direct Inverse Modeling Approach for Hysteresis Compensation of Piezoelectric Actuator in Feedforward Applications , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[26]  Y. Cao,et al.  An Inversion-Based Model Predictive Control With an Integral-of-Error State Variable for Piezoelectric Actuators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[27]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Control of dynamics-coupling effects in piezo-actuator for high-speed AFM operation , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[28]  Faa-Jeng Lin,et al.  Sliding-mode control for a two-dimensional piezo-positioning stage , 2007 .

[29]  C. Su,et al.  An Analytical Generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model Inversion for Hysteresis Compensation in Micropositioning Control , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[30]  J.A. De Abreu-Garcia,et al.  Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator with hysteresis compensation using inverse Preisach model , 2005, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[31]  Gérard Bloch,et al.  Neural Control of Fast Nonlinear Systems— Application to a Turbocharged SI Engine With VCT , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[32]  X. B. Chen,et al.  Integrated PID-Based Sliding Mode State Estimation and Control for Piezoelectric Actuators , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[33]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Micro-/Nanopositioning Using Model Predictive Output Integral Discrete Sliding Mode Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[34]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Inversion-free stabilization and regulation of systems with hysteresis using integral action , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[35]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  A Survey of Control Issues in Nanopositioning , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[36]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Predictive control : with constraints , 2002 .

[37]  D. Croft,et al.  Creep, Hysteresis, and Vibration Compensation for Piezoactuators: Atomic Force Microscopy Application , 2001 .

[38]  W J Zhang,et al.  On the dynamics of piezoactuated positioning systems. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[39]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  Neural identification applied to predictive control of a solar plant , 1998 .

[40]  M. S. Rana,et al.  Performance of Sinusoidal Scanning With MPC in AFM Imaging , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[41]  Xiongbiao Chen,et al.  A Survey of Modeling and Control of Piezoelectric Actuators , 2013 .

[42]  Junzhi Yu,et al.  Neural-Network-Based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Piezoelectric Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[43]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Postface to “ Model Predictive Control : Theory and Design ” , 2012 .