A comparison of axial field topologies employing SMC for traction applications

This paper compares three high aspect ratio axial field topologies for traction applications employing soft magnetic composite (SMC). The paper examines the following topologies using finite element (FE) method: a torus, a yokeless and segmented armature (YASA), and a single-sided configuration. All the machines are designed to the same specification for a light electric vehicle, and the FE simulations are benchmarked against prototype motors tested in the laboratory. The topologies are compared in terms of torque density, efficiency, manufacturability, and cost, and benchmarked against a traditional laminated radial flux machine. The paper discusses several important aspects of designing axial flux machines using SMC, and shows that the YASA topology has the best overall performance due to its shorter iron circuit. The YASA machine is significantly more compact than rival designs and due to the lower material usage, is also cheaper to manufacture despite the higher cost of SMC compared to laminations.

[1]  B.C. Mecrow,et al.  Axial Flux Motors Using Compacted Insulated Iron Powder and Laminations - Design and Test Results , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, 2005..

[2]  Nicola Bianchi,et al.  Impact of Rotor Losses in a 12-Slot 10-Pole Axial Flux PM Machine , 2008, 2008 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[3]  Dean J. Patterson,et al.  A comparison of radial and axial flux structures in electrical machines , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference.

[4]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  A comparison of power density for axial flux machines based on general purpose sizing equations , 1999 .

[5]  A.G. Jack,et al.  Permanent magnet machines with powdered iron cores and pre-pressed windings , 1999, Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36370).

[6]  Fabrizio Marignetti,et al.  Design of Axial Flux PM Synchronous Machines Through 3-D Coupled Electromagnetic Thermal and Fluid-Dynamical Finite-Element Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  F. Profumo,et al.  A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for PM synchronous motors , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[8]  N. Ertugrul,et al.  Analysis and Performance Evaluation of an Axial-Field Brushless PM Machine Utilising Soft Magnetic Composites , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.