Effect of Conductive Hearing Loss and Middle Ear Surgery on Binaural Hearing

This study investigated whether conductive hearing loss reduces normal binaural hearing advantages and whether binaural hearing advantages are normal in patients who have had hearing thresholds improved by middle ear surgery. Binaural hearing was assessed at a test frequency of 500 Hz using the masking level difference and interaural time discrimination thresholds. Results indicated that binaural hearing is often poor in conductive lesion patients and that the reduction in binaural hearing is not always consistent with a simple attenuation of the acoustic signal. Poor binaural hearing sometimes occurs even when middle ear surgery has resulted in bilaterally normal hearing thresholds. Our preliminary results are consistent with the interpretation that auditory deprivation due to conductive hearing loss may result in poor binaural auditory processing.

[1]  A. Quaranta,et al.  Clinical value of the tonal masking level difference. , 1978, Audiology.

[2]  E. Rubel,et al.  Afferent influences on brainstem auditory nuclei of the chicken: N. laminaris dendritic length following monaural conductive hearing loss , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  D. McFadden,et al.  Masking-level differences determined with and without interaural disparities in masker intensity. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  I. Hirsh.  The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[5]  D. Webster,et al.  Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.

[6]  F L Wightman,et al.  Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  M. Silverman,et al.  Plasticity of binaural interaction. II. Critical period and changes in midline response. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M A Fernandes,et al.  Monaural and binaural auditory frequency resolution measured using bandlimited noise and notched-noise masking. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A R Antonelli,et al.  Masking level difference: another tool for the evaluation of peripheral and cortical defects. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  A Quaranta,et al.  Masking level difference in normal and pathological ears. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  W O Olsen,et al.  Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  W A Yost,et al.  Discriminations of interaural phase differences. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  G Lidén,et al.  Sound localization with phase audiometry. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Just Noticeable Differences in Dichotic Phase , 1956 .

[16]  J Jerger,et al.  Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[17]  T. Dolan.  Effect of masker spectrum level on masking-level differences at low signal frequencies. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  H. S. Colburn,et al.  Sound localization with impaired hearing , 1979 .

[19]  G. Thompson,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Early Recurrent Middle Ear Disease , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.