Blocking evaluation and wavelength dimensioning of dynamic WDM networks without wavelength conversion

In this paper, a new fast and accurate methodology to evaluate the blocking probability (burst loss probability) in dynamic WDM networks without wavelength conversion is presented. The proposed model considers different traffic loads at each network connection (heterogeneous traffic). To take into account the wavelength continuity constraint, the method sees the network as a sequence of networks where all the links have capacity 1. Every network in the sequence is evaluated separately using a heuristic-based analytical technique. Then, a procedure combines the results of these evaluations in a way that captures the dependencies that occur in real systems due to the competition for bandwidth between the different connections. The method efficiently achieves results very close to those obtained by simulation, but orders of magnitude faster, allowing the evaluation of the blocking probability of all users (connections) for mesh network topologies. We illustrate the use of this procedure in the dimensioning of a WDM network, that is, in calculating the number of wavelengths on every network link, by considering the traffic load of every user, the routing algorithm and the maximum connection blocking probability acceptable by every user (quality of service) are determined.

[1]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Computation of Blocking Probability for Large Circuit Switched Networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Joan Triay,et al.  Analytical Blocking Probability Model for Hybrid Immediate and Advance Reservations in Optical WDM Networks , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Yongli Zhao,et al.  Blocking probability analysis model for flexible spectrum optical networks , 2014 .

[4]  Dahai Xu,et al.  Network Design and Architectures for Highly Dynamic Next-Generation IP-Over-Optical Long Distance Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  M. Duser,et al.  Analysis of burst scheduling for dynamic wavelength assignment in optical burst-switched networks , 2001, LEOS 2001. 14th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (Cat. No.01CH37242).

[6]  T. Kobayashi,et al.  102.3-Tb/s (224 × 548-Gb/s) C- and extended L-band all-Raman transmission over 240 km using PDM-64QAM single carrier FDM with digital pilot tone , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[7]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Conflict detection and resolution in two-dimensional prefix router tables , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[8]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Analysis of blocking probability for distributed lightpath establishment in WDM optical networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  Ahmed Mokhtar,et al.  Adaptive wavelength routing in all-optical networks , 1998, TNET.

[10]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Blocking in all-optical networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Villy Bæk Iversen,et al.  TELETRAFFIC ENGINEERING HANDBOOK , 2001 .

[12]  A. A. Fredericks Congestion in blocking systems — a simple approximation technique , 1980, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[13]  Anwar Alyatama Wavelength decomposition approach for computing blocking probabilities in multicast WDM optical networks , 2014, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[14]  Anwar Alyatama Wavelength decomposition approach for computing blocking probabilities in WDM optical networks without wavelength conversions , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Reinaldo Vallejos Campos,et al.  Blocking evaluation and analysis of dynamic WDM networks under heterogeneous ON/OFF traffic , 2016, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[16]  Thomas Bonald The Erlang model with non-poisson call arrivals , 2006, SIGMETRICS '06/Performance '06.

[17]  An Ge,et al.  On optical burst switching and self-similar traffic , 2000, IEEE Communications Letters.

[18]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Sensitivity of Blocking Probability in the Generalized Engset Model for OBS , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  Jintae Yu,et al.  Upgrade design of survivable wavelength-routed networks for increase of traffic loads , 2005, Conference onOptical Network Design and Modeling, 2005..

[20]  Iguatemi E. Fonseca,et al.  Estimating the blocking probability in wavelength-routed optical networks , 2013, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[21]  Anwar Al-Yatama Computing blocking probabilities in survivable WDM optical networks , 2013, Photonic Network Communications.

[22]  Raul C. Almeida,et al.  Accounting for link load correlation in the estimation of blocking probabilities in arbitrary network topologies , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[23]  Adel A. M. Saleh,et al.  Technology and architecture to enable the explosive growth of the internet , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Kee Chaing Chua,et al.  Route optimization in optical burst switched networks considering the streamline effect , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[25]  S. Zachary,et al.  Loss networks , 2009, 0903.0640.

[26]  J He,et al.  Analysis of Blocking Probability for First-Fit Wavelength Assignment in Transmission-Impaired Optical Networks , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[27]  Jing Teng,et al.  Routing path optimization in optical burst switched networks , 2005, Conference onOptical Network Design and Modeling, 2005..

[28]  M. Duser,et al.  Investigation of the scalability of dynamic wavelength-routed optical networks[Invited] , 2004 .

[29]  A. Zapata-Beghelli,et al.  Dynamic Versus Static Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[30]  Yijun Xiong,et al.  Control architecture in optical burst-switched WDM networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[31]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[32]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  A new approach to dimensioning optical networks , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..