Transient Dynamic System Behavior of Pressure Actuated Cellular Structures in a Morphing Wing

High aspect ratio aircraft have a significantly reduced induced drag, but have only limited installation space for control surfaces near the wingtip. This paper describes a multidisciplinary design methodology for a morphing aileron that is based on pressure-actuated cellular structures (PACS). The focus of this work is on the transient dynamic system behavior of the multi-functional aileron. Decisive design aspects are the actuation speed, the resistance against external loads, and constraints preparing for a future wind tunnel test. The structural stiffness under varying aerodynamic loads is examined while using a reduced-order truss model and a high-fidelity finite element analysis. The simulations of the internal flow investigate the transient pressurization process that limits the dynamic actuator response. The authors present a reduced-order model based on the Pseudo Bond Graph methodology enabling time-efficient flow simulation and compare the results to computational fluid dynamic simulations. The findings of this work demonstrate high structural resistance against external forces and the feasibility of high actuation speeds over the entire operating envelope. Future research will incorporate the fluid–structure interaction and the assessment of load alleviation capability.

[1]  Christian Hühne,et al.  Shape-variable seals for pressure actuated cellular structures , 2015 .

[2]  M Pagitz,et al.  Pressure-actuated cellular structures , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[4]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Computation of Actuation Power Requirements for Smart Wings with Morphing Airfoils , 2002 .

[5]  Remco I. Leine,et al.  Shape Optimization of Compliant Pressure Actuated Cellular Structures , 2014, 1403.2197.

[6]  Suyi Li,et al.  Plant-inspired adaptive structures and materials for morphing and actuation: a review , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[7]  Dennis Vechtel,et al.  Analysis of a multi-functional high-lift system driven by an active differential gear box , 2014 .

[8]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Jet Propulsion Engine Modelling Using Pseudo Bond Graph Approach , 2019, Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Fans and Blowers; Marine; Honors and Awards.

[9]  Christian Hühne,et al.  Enhanced design methods for pressure-actuated cellular structures , 2016 .

[10]  Arthur Seibel,et al.  On-Board Pneumatic Pressure Generation Methods for Soft Robotics Applications , 2018, Actuators.

[11]  R. Barrett,et al.  Mechanics of pressure-adaptive honeycomb and its application to wing morphing , 2011 .

[12]  Fernando Lau,et al.  A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings , 2017 .

[13]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Topology-Optimized Design and Testing of a Pressure-Driven Morphing-Aerofoil Trailing-Edge Structure , 2013 .

[14]  Liyong Tong,et al.  Adaptive pressure-controlled cellular structures for shape morphing I: design and analysis , 2013 .

[15]  Michael Schäfer,et al.  Structural and Systems Modelling of a Fluid-driven Morphing Winglet Trailing Edge , 2020 .

[16]  Christian Hühne,et al.  Holistic design and implementation of pressure actuated cellular structures , 2015 .

[17]  Donald Margolis,et al.  Bond graph fluid line models for inclusion with dynamic systems simulations , 1979 .

[18]  Brian Sanders,et al.  Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Characteristics of Wings with Conformal Control Surfaces for Morphing Aircraft , 2003 .

[19]  Jun Lv,et al.  Two-Scale Topology Optimization of the 3D Plant-Inspired Adaptive Cellular Structures for Morphing Applications , 2020 .

[20]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aircraft Design with Active Load Alleviation and Natural Laminar Flow , 2014 .

[21]  Annika Raatz,et al.  An Overview of Novel Actuators for Soft Robotics , 2018, Actuators.

[22]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Biomimetic FAA-certifiable, artificial muscle structures for commercial aircraft wings , 2014 .

[23]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Testing of Folding Wingtip for Gust Load Alleviation of Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wing , 2020 .

[24]  Johannes Riemenschneider,et al.  Pressure-Driven Morphing Devices for 3D Shape Changes With Multiple Degrees-of-Freedom , 2018, Volume 1: Development and Characterization of Multifunctional Materials; Modeling, Simulation, and Control of Adaptive Systems; Integrated System Design and Implementation.

[25]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .

[26]  Michael Sinapius,et al.  Development and Testing of Woven FRP Flexure Hinges for Pressure-Actuated Cellular Structures with Regard to Morphing Wing Applications , 2019 .

[27]  I. Bond,et al.  Morphing skins , 2008, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[28]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Flight testing of the FlexFloil™ adaptive compliant trailing edge , 2016 .

[29]  Johannes Riemenschneider,et al.  DLR's Morphing Wing Activities within the European Network , 2014 .

[30]  D. M. Elzey,et al.  A bio-inspired high-authority actuator for shape morphing structures , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[31]  Christian Hühne,et al.  PACS—Realization of an adaptive concept using pressure actuated cellular structures , 2014 .

[32]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[33]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Active aeroelastic tailoring of an adaptive Flexspar stabilator , 1996 .