The ideology of ergonomics

This paper examines the positivist and empiricist philosophical ideas that underpin mainstream ergonomics and argues that they undermine the discipline's ability to properly theorise the nature of the social world. Instead and as a consequence of these largely implicit philosophical beliefs ergonomics is an ideological discipline whose social use is largely shaped to reflect the interests of dominant social institutions, whether public or private, that tend to control the workplace. Arguing from the perspective of critical social science the paper says that questions of design are central to debates about the good society (how people should live) as indeed some ergonomic researchers have recently begun to argue. The task of the paper is to help encourage such debate within the discipline by clarifying what it sees as the ideological role that ergonomics plays in society and how this ideology is, in turn, reflected in its philosophical assumptions. The importance of the paper for ergonomic theory is that it highlights the need for the discipline to engage in a critical manner with its philosophical assumptions. It does this by exposing the problematic nature of its positivist philosophy, arguing that as a consequence of the latter ergonomics in practice is an ideological discipline.

[1]  Deyi Li,et al.  On Uncertainties of Knowledge , 2007 .

[2]  Martin G. Helander,et al.  A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[3]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .

[4]  A. Sayer Method in Social Science , 1992 .

[5]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Methods in the understanding of human factors , 2005 .

[6]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Kodak's Ergonomic Design for People at Work , 2009 .

[7]  L. Desnoyers The role of qualitative methodology in ergonomics: a commentary , 2004 .

[8]  Stephen Pheasant,et al.  Ergonomics, Work and Health , 1991, Macmillan Education UK.

[9]  Alex Kirlik,et al.  Modes in Human-Machine Systems: Constructs, Representation, and Classification , 1999 .

[10]  Andy Slovak,et al.  Introduction to Ergonomics , 2011 .

[11]  David J. Will A realist theory of science , 1981, Medical History.

[12]  Gerard Delanty Social Science: Beyond Realism and Contructivism , 1997 .

[13]  D L McArthur,et al.  Epidemiology of acute low back injury in employees of a large home improvement retail company. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  The design agenda , 1996 .

[15]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[16]  Klaus J. Zink,et al.  Human factors, management and society , 2006 .

[17]  John A Walker,et al.  Design History and the History of Design , 1990 .

[18]  Alison Archibald A development culture , 2007 .

[19]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The Ergonomics of Torture: The Moral Dimension of Evolving Human-Machine Technology , 2003 .

[20]  P. A. Hancock,et al.  On the relevance of qualitative methods for ergonomics , 2004 .

[21]  A Chapanis,et al.  National and cultural variables in ergonomics. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[22]  Neville Moray,et al.  2. CULTURE, CONTEXT AND PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[23]  Stuart Hall The Problem of Ideology-Marxism without Guarantees , 1986 .

[24]  Jean-Claude Sagot,et al.  Ergonomics in product design: safety factor , 2003 .

[25]  P. Pettit The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[26]  S. Wainwright,et al.  Philosophical Problems with Social Research on Health Inequalities , 2004, Health Care Analysis.

[27]  Ronald G. Stansfield Ergonomics at Work , 1983 .

[28]  W. T. Singleton,et al.  Man-machine systems , 1974 .

[29]  David Byrne,et al.  Interpreting Quantitative Data , 2002 .

[30]  L. B. Archer,et al.  Systematic method for designers , 1963 .

[31]  Victor J. Papanek,et al.  Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1972 .

[32]  D. Hawkes Ideology, second edition , 2004 .

[33]  J. Huff The Secret History of the War on Cancer , 2008, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[34]  A. Ron,et al.  Regression Analysis and the Philosophy of Social Science , 2002 .

[35]  Nigel Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work, 3rd Edition , 2005 .

[36]  A. Mearman,et al.  On tourism and hospitality management research: A critical realist proposal , 2004 .

[37]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[38]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2020, SAGE Research Methods Foundations.

[39]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  On the theory of fuzzy signal detection: Theoretical and practical considerations , 2000 .

[40]  Peter Halfpenny,et al.  Social Theory and Political Practice , 1976 .

[41]  Mark Smith Social science in question , 1998 .

[42]  W. Outhwaite,et al.  New philosophies of social science , 1987 .

[43]  John R. Wilson,et al.  The role for qualitative methodology in ergonomics: a case study to explore theoretical issues , 2004 .

[44]  S. Kumar,et al.  Theories of musculoskeletal injury causation , 2001, Ergonomics.

[45]  Ian McClelland,et al.  Involving people in design , 2005 .

[46]  I. Wallerstein The Uncertainties of Knowledge , 2004 .

[47]  Philip J. Dobson Longitudinal Case Research: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2001 .

[48]  Jan Dul,et al.  Ergonomics for Beginners , 2008 .

[49]  H. Kanis,et al.  The quantitative-qualitative research dichotomy revisited , 2004 .

[50]  Raymond M. Plant Modern Political Thought , 1991 .

[51]  W. H. Mayall,et al.  Principles in design , 1979 .