In vivo bubble nucleation probability in sheep brain tissue

Gas nuclei exist naturally in living bodies. Their activation initiates cavitation activity, and is possible using short ultrasonic excitations of high amplitude. However, little is known about the nuclei population in vivo, and therefore about the rarefaction pressure required to form bubbles in tissue. A novel method dedicated to in vivo investigations was used here that combines passive and active cavitation detection with a multi-element linear ultrasound probe (4–7 MHz). Experiments were performed in vivo on the brain of trepanated sheep. Bubble nucleation was induced using a focused single-element transducer (central frequency 660 kHz, f-number = 1) driven by a high power (up to 5 kW) electric burst of two cycles. Successive passive recording and ultrafast active imaging were shown to allow detection of a single nucleation event in brain tissue in vivo. Experiments carried out on eight sheep allowed statistical studies of the bubble nucleation process. The nucleation probability was evaluated as a function of the peak negative pressure. No nucleation event could be detected with a peak negative pressure weaker than −12.7 MPa, i.e. one order of magnitude higher than the recommendations based on the mechanical index. Below this threshold, bubble nucleation in vivo in brain tissues is a random phenomenon.

[1]  Mathieu Pernot,et al.  Combined passive detection and ultrafast active imaging of cavitation events induced by short pulses of high-intensity ultrasound , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Noninvasive Creation of an Atrial Septal Defect by Histotripsy in a Canine Model , 2010, Circulation.

[3]  C. Cain,et al.  Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model. , 2009, Urology.

[4]  C. Cain,et al.  Histotripsy of rabbit renal tissue in vivo: temporal histologic trends. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[5]  Sébastien Balibar,et al.  Cavitation pressure in water. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Jean-Eric Blatteau,et al.  Gas nuclei, their origin, and their role in bubble formation. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  J Brian Fowlkes,et al.  Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Xinmai Yang,et al.  A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G. Montaldo,et al.  Optical measurement of transient ultrasonic shock waves , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[10]  C. Church,et al.  Spontaneous homogeneous nucleation, inertial cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[12]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  The crevice model of bubble nucleation , 1989 .

[13]  B D Butler,et al.  The lung as a filter for microbubbles. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[14]  J. Barger,et al.  Acoustical properties of the human skull. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Karl F. Herzfeld,et al.  Gas Bubbles with Organic Skin as Cavitation Nuclei , 1954 .

[16]  B. E. Noltingk,et al.  Cavitation Produced by Ultrasonics: Theoretical Conditions for the Onset of Cavitation , 1951 .

[17]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  Transcranial Ultrasonic Therapy Based on Time Reversal of Acoustically Induced Cavitation Bubble Signature , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[19]  Douglas L. Miller Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  V. Khokhlova,et al.  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF VARIOUS PARAMETERS OF ACOUSTIC FIELD IN HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED BEAMS , 2006 .

[21]  J. Fowlkes,et al.  Section 7‐‐discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  F. Fry,et al.  Ultrasound and microbubbles: their generation, detection and potential utilization in tissue and organ therapy--experimental. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  P. Carson,et al.  Acoustic generation of intra-arterial contrast boluses. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  In vivo detection of ultrasonically induced cavitation by a fibre-optic technique. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  R. Apfel,et al.  An improved theory for the prediction of microcavitation thresholds , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  P. Bert La pression barométrique : recherches de physiologie expérimentale , 1878 .