A quasi-experimental study of three online learning courses in computing

This paper presents the results of a 3-year quasi-experimental study of three Masters courses in computing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which the teaching and learning of these courses were enhanced by being developed and delivered in an online format as compared to face-to-face full-time and part-time delivery. Key methodological questions and issues to be examined were: (a) any observable difference in student performance as measured by end-of-module grades/marks; (b) any observable difference between coursework and exam performance in the technically-oriented modules; (c) any observable difference in dropout rates, student satisfaction and faculty satisfaction. The study examined the results from 4684 module enrolments, consisting of 269 online students, 796 part-time students, and 3619 full-time students distributed across 7 modules and 79 module instantiations. The data was gathered using a variety of different means which included interviews, end of module questionnaires, student records and enrolment data. The results show that the online students consistently perform better then the face-to-face students and the paper reflects on this finding.

[1]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[2]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online , 1995 .

[3]  Terrence R. Redding,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Online Learning versus Classroom Learning , 2001 .

[4]  G. N. Getman.  Computers in the Classroom , 1983 .

[5]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[6]  Tim Duffy,et al.  Comparing distance education and conventional education: Observations from a comparative study of post‐registration nurses , 2002 .

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[8]  J. Snell,et al.  Online Education and Academic Rigor: A Research Note , 1999 .

[9]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  Thomas R. Ramage.  The "No Significant Difference" Phenomenon: A Literature Review , 2002 .

[11]  Jo Ellen Perry,et al.  Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students? , 2001 .

[12]  Rory McGreal.  Comparison of the Attitudes of Learners Taking Audiographic Teleconferencing Courses in Secondary Schools in Northern Ontario. , 1994 .

[13]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  What''s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning , 1999 .

[14]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999 , 2001 .

[15]  David Jones,et al.  A comparison of traditional and online formats in a public speaking course , 2001 .

[16]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Cognitive efficiency: Toward a revised theory of media , 1997 .

[17]  J. W. Asher,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education , 2000 .

[18]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[19]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[20]  A. P. Rovai.  Building Sense of Community at a Distance , 2002, Distances et médiations des savoirs.

[21]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[22]  Mark Stansfield,et al.  Enhancing Student Performance in Online Learning and Traditional Face-to-Face Class Delivery , 2004, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..