False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization

Results from the classic dot pattern distortion paradigm have sometimes yielded prototype enhancement effects that could not be accounted for by exemplar models of categorization. However, in these experiments the status of the prototype was confounded with certain stimulus-specific properties as well as with the frequency of presentation of the prototype during testing. In two mock-subliminal experiments, participants made categorization judgments to patterns that were generated as prototypes, low-level distortions, or high-level distortions. The participants rated the prototypes as being more likely to be members of a category, although no patterns were presented during training, and there was no objective category structure. In two other experiments, greater prototype enhancement effects were observed when the prototype and low-level distortions were presented with greater frequency during transfer. These results suggest that classic prototype enhancement effects may not be due to the abstraction of a prototype at time of original learning, but rather to other factors not formalized in extant models.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Exemplar Theory's Predicted Typicality Gradient Can Be Tested and Disconfirmed , 2002, Psychological science.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  D L Medin,et al.  Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  S. Zaki,et al.  Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[8]  D. Homa,et al.  Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories , 1984 .

[9]  D. Homa.  On the Nature of Categories , 1984 .

[10]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[12]  John P. Clapper,et al.  Category invention in unsupervised learning , 1994 .

[13]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[14]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  A two-stage model of category construction ☆ , 1992 .

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[16]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[17]  D. Homa,et al.  Category Breadth and the Abstraction of Prototypical Information. , 1976 .

[18]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[19]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation , 1998 .

[20]  P. Reber,et al.  Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. , 1998, Learning & memory.

[21]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Perceptual Learning and Free Classification , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  E. Heit,et al.  Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Towards a unified account of supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[25]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory , 1999 .

[26]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Straight talk about linear separability , 1997 .

[27]  Woo-Kyoung Ahn,et al.  A Two-Stage Model of Category Construction , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  L R Squire,et al.  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.