The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for a Local Authority: A Case Study in Italy

The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) has been calculated for many countries, but rarely at the local level. This paper shows how the index has been calculated for the Province of Siena, Central Italy. The whole procedure is illustrated step by step, including the search for the most suitable and precise methods to obtain reliable values for each item composing the index. Application of ISEW at a very local level was found to be feasible. The most general difficulty encountered was the lack of an adequate institutionalised source of statistical information to support the construction of indicators other than purely economic or demographic ones. The availability of data depends on the interest in implementing projects of sustainable management of natural resources and land on the part of local authorities and their consequent willingness to invest money and human resources on such projects. The ISEW is a good tool for local environmental policy, because it gives a more realistic representation of the well-being of the population than GDP, since it includes environmental and social items not considered in conventional national accounting. Furthermore, in Italy, the principle of administrative decentralization has been implemented in recent years to such an extent that the central government devolved part of its power to Regions, Provinces and Municipalities. Arguably, local authorities should therefore allocate more resources to pursue their policies towards sustainability, an issue which modern electoral campaigns are often based on. The results for the Province of Siena show that there is a large gap between local GDP and ISEW (about 37% of GDP).

[1]  A. Bodini,et al.  Environmental quality and sustainability in the province of Reggio Emilia (Italy): using multi-criteria analysis to assess and compare municipal performance. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Sustainable Economic Welfare in Sweden: A Pilot Index 1950-1992 , 1999 .

[3]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[4]  C. Leipert A Critical Appraisal of Gross National Product: The Measurement of Net National Welfare and Environmental Accounting: Impressions and Reflections in the Wake of Discussions Conducted during a Visit to the United States in May 1985. , 1987 .

[5]  S. Gil,et al.  An index of sustainable economic welfare for Poland , 2003 .

[6]  M. Anielski,et al.  THE GENUINE PROGRESS INDICATOR — 1998 UPDATE , 1999 .

[7]  Philip Andrew Lawn,et al.  A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes , 2003 .

[8]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Estimates of the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Vermont, Chittenden County and Burlington, from 1950 to 2000 , 2004 .

[9]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The ISEW -- not an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare , 1999 .

[10]  R. England Measurement of social well-being: alternatives to gross domestic product , 1998 .

[11]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  A guide to community sustainability indicators , 2000 .

[12]  C. Leipert,et al.  National Income and Economic Growth: The Conceptual Side of Defensive Expenditures , 1989 .

[13]  Nic Marks,et al.  Measuring sustainable economic welfare. A pilot index: 1950-1990 , 1994 .

[14]  J. Church Human Development Report , 2001 .

[15]  Manfred Max-Neef,et al.  Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis , 1995 .

[16]  Silvia Tiezzi,et al.  The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (Isew) for Italy , 1998 .

[17]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  On the Methodology of Isew, Gpi and Related Measures: Some Constructive Suggestions and Some Doubt on the 'Threshold' Hypothesis , 2000 .

[18]  Ian Moffatt,et al.  Sustainable Development: Principles, Analysis and Policies , 1996 .

[19]  H. Daly Toward some operational principles of sustainable development , 1990 .

[20]  Engelbert Stockhammer,et al.  The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) as an alternative to GDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955-1992 , 1997 .

[21]  J. Tobin,et al.  Is growth obsolete , 1973 .

[22]  Beatriz E Castañeda An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile , 1999 .

[23]  T. Power For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future , 1993 .

[24]  Philip Andrew Lawn,et al.  Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale? Finding out with the aid of `benefit' and `cost' accounts and a sustainable net benefit index , 1999 .