Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study

The precise neural mechanisms underlying speech perception are still to a large extent unknown. The most accepted view is that speech perception depends on auditory‐cognitive mechanisms specifically devoted to the analysis of speech sounds. An alternative view is that, crucial for speech perception, it is the activation of the articulatory (motor) gestures that generate these sounds. The listener understands the speaker when his/her articulatory gestures are activated (motor theory of speech perception). Here, by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we demonstrate that, during speech listening, there is an increase of motor‐evoked potentials recorded from the listeners' tongue muscles when the presented words strongly involve, when pronounced, tongue movements. Although these data do not prove the motor theory of speech perception, they demonstrate for the first time that word listening produces a phoneme specific activation of speech motor centres.

[1]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[2]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[3]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[4]  D W Massaro,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. Evaluation and Integration of Visual and Auditory Information in Speech Perception , 2022 .

[5]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[6]  H M Sussman Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: human language analogs to the barn owl. , 1989, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perception of Synthesized Audible and Visible Speech , 1990 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  J. Decety,et al.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[13]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[14]  R. Hari,et al.  Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the relation of speech to language , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  L. Craighero,et al.  Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  S. M. Williams,et al.  The Premotor Cortex , 2001 .

[20]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception , 2004 .

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.