Is the impact of health shocks cushioned by socio-economic status

This paper examines the long-term effects of low birthweight (LBW) on educational attainments, labor market outcomes, and health status using a data from the National Child Development Study. The study has followed the cohort of children born in Great Britain during one week in 1958 through age 33. We pay particular attention to possible interactions between LBW and socioeconomic status (SES), asking to what extent the deleterious effects of LBW are mitigated by higher SES. We find that LBW has significant long-term effects on self-reported health status, educational attainments, and labor market outcomes. However, there is little evidence of variation in the effects of LBW by SES. An important exception is that high SES women of LBW are less likely to report that they are in poor or fair health than other LBW women. Relative economic status shows a strong tendency to persist from one generation to the next. However, the mechanisms underlying the inter-generational transmission of status are poorly understood. Three facts suggest that health shocks offer a possible explanation for some of the persistence. First, poor health among teenagers and adults has been shown to have a negative impact on educational attainment, employment, and earnings (c.f. Currie and Madrian, 1999 for a review of this literature). Second, the poor are more likely to suffer from most forms of ill health than the rich (c.f. Wilkinson, 1996; Hertzman and Weins, 1996). Third, negative health shocks may have worse consequences for the poor than for the rich. For example, some observers have concluded that poor children suffer from double jeopardy in that they are both more likely to suffer negative shocks, and less likely to be able to recover from them (Bradley et al. 1994; Parker, Greer, and Zuckerman, 1988). This paper investigates the linkages between socio-economic status (SES) and a specific negative health shock: Low birth weight (LBW). There is much evidence that children of higher socio-economic status do better than other children on average, regardless of the outcome measure. This evidence may reflect either the effects of increased access to resources per se or the greater "efficiency" with which more educated (for example) mothers can use these inputs (c.f. Mayer, 1997; Rosensweig and Wolpin, 1994). There is also a great deal of evidence linking LBW to poor health, cognitive deficits, and behavioral problems among young children (c.f. Aylward et al., 1989; Brooks-Gunn, Liaw, and Klebanov, 1992; Kohen et al. 1997; McCormick, Gortmaker, and Sobel, 1990). Moreover, the problems tend to be most severe in the lightest infants. These observations suggest that the effects of LBW may be long lasting, but there has been little direct corroboration of this conjecture. The first goal of this study is to shed light on this issue.

[1]  W. Tooley,et al.  Very low birth weight infants at 8 and 11 years of age: role of neonatal illness and family status. , 1988, Pediatrics.

[2]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: a metaanalysis. , 1989, The Journal of pediatrics.

[3]  S. Escalona Babies at double hazard: early development of infants at biologic and social risk. , 1982, Pediatrics.

[4]  Brigitte C. Madrian,et al.  Health, Health Insurance and the Labor Market , 1998 .

[5]  Kenneth I. Wolpin,et al.  Are There Increasing Returns to the Intergenerational Production of Human Capital? Maternal Schooling and Child Intellectual Achievement , 1994 .

[6]  C. Meghir,et al.  The Evolution of Wages in the United Kingdom: Evidence from Micro Data , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[7]  D. Barker,et al.  WEIGHT IN INFANCY AND DEATH FROM ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE , 1989, The Lancet.

[8]  Ken Fogelman,et al.  Growing Up in Great Britain: Papers from the National Child Development Study , 1983 .

[9]  E. Werner,et al.  The Children of Kauai: A Longitudinal Study from the Prenatal Period to Age Ten , 1971 .

[10]  B. Zuckerman,et al.  Double jeopardy: the impact of poverty on early child development. , 1988, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[11]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  Effects of Early Intervention on Cognitive Function of Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants, , 1992, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  Concordance of Maternal and Teacher Ratings of School and Behavior Problems in Children of Varying Birth Weights , 1997, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[13]  R. Murnane,et al.  The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination , 1995 .

[14]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Enhancing the cognitive outcomes of low birth weight, premature infants: for whom is the intervention most effective? , 1992, Pediatrics.

[15]  C. Hertzman,et al.  Child development and long-term outcomes: a population health perspective and summary of successful interventions. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[16]  S. Connolly,et al.  THE OCCUPATIONAL SUCCESS OF YOUNG MEN WHO LEFT SCHOOL AT SIXTEEN , 1992 .

[17]  R. Wilkinson Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality , 1996 .

[18]  R. Bradley,et al.  Effects of poverty on home environment: an analysis of three-year outcome data for low birth weight premature infants. , 1996, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[19]  R. Bradley,et al.  Early indications of resilience and their relation to experiences in the home environments of low birthweight, premature children living in poverty. , 1994, Child development.

[20]  Duncan C. Thomas,et al.  Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome Early Test Scores , Socioeconomic Status and Future Outcomes , 1998 .

[21]  R. Bradley,et al.  Family Environment and Behavioral Development of Low‐birthweight Children , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.