Virtual Averaging Making Nonframe-Averaged Optical Coherence Tomography Images Comparable to Frame-Averaged Images

Purpose Developing a novel image enhancement method so that nonframe-averaged optical coherence tomography (OCT) images become comparable to active eye-tracking frame-averaged OCT images. Methods Twenty-one eyes of 21 healthy volunteers were scanned with noneye-tracking nonframe-averaged OCT device and active eye-tracking frame-averaged OCT device. Virtual averaging was applied to nonframe-averaged images with voxel resampling and adding amplitude deviation with 15-time repetitions. Signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and the distance between the end of visible nasal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and the foveola were assessed to evaluate the image enhancement effect and retinal layer visibility. Retinal thicknesses before and after processing were also measured. Results All virtual-averaged nonframe-averaged images showed notable improvement and clear resemblance to active eye-tracking frame-averaged images. Signal-to-noise and CNR were significantly improved (SNR: 30.5 vs. 47.6 dB, CNR: 4.4 vs. 6.4 dB, original versus processed, P < 0.0001, paired t-test). The distance between the end of visible nasal RNFL and the foveola was significantly different before (681.4 vs. 446.5 μm, Cirrus versus Spectralis, P < 0.0001) but not after processing (442.9 vs. 446.5 μm, P = 0.76). Sectoral macular total retinal and circumpapillary RNFL thicknesses showed systematic differences between Cirrus and Spectralis that became not significant after processing. Conclusion The virtual averaging method successfully improved nontracking nonframe-averaged OCT image quality and made the images comparable to active eye-tracking frame-averaged OCT images. Translational Relevance Virtual averaging may enable detailed retinal structure studies on images acquired using a mixture of nonframe-averaged and frame-averaged OCT devices without concerning about systematic differences in both qualitative and quantitative aspects.

[1]  Kostadinka Bizheva,et al.  Interval type-II fuzzy anisotropic diffusion algorithm for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images. , 2009, Optics express.

[2]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography images by use of a spatially adaptive wavelet filter. , 2004, Optics letters.

[3]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[5]  Wolfgang Schramm,et al.  Team , 2018, Spaces of Intensity.

[6]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[7]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Masanori Hangai,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution versus speckle noise-reduction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Optics express.

[9]  Maciej Wojtkowski,et al.  Retinal assessment using optical coherence tomography , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging Individual A-scan Signal Normalization between Two Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices , 2022 .

[11]  R. Huber,et al.  Megahertz OCT for ultrawide-field retinal imaging with a 1050 nm Fourier domain mode-locked laser. , 2011, Optics express.

[12]  K. Sung,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fibre layer measurements using optical coherence tomography versions 1 and 3 in eyes with band atrophy of the optic nerve and normal controls , 2007, Eye.

[14]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography , 2008, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[15]  Birgit Sander,et al.  Optical coherence tomography—current technology and applications in clinical and biomedical research , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[16]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography images using digital filtering. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Robert N. Weinreb,et al.  Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[18]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  Effectiveness of averaging strategies to reduce variance in retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Ultrahigh speed spectral / Fourier domain OCT ophthalmic imaging at 70,000 to 312,500 axial scans per second. , 2008, Optics express.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Signal normalization reduces systematic measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  Joan W. Miller,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  William J Feuer,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[26]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Wavelet denoising during optical coherence tomography of the prostate nerves using the complex wavelet transform , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[31]  A. Fercher,et al.  In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[32]  Kostadinka Bizheva,et al.  Speckle noise reduction algorithm for optical coherence tomography based on interval type II fuzzy set. , 2007, Optics express.

[33]  T. L. Pinto,et al.  Clinical applications of optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[34]  Kia-Chong Chua,et al.  Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement Between 2 Spectral Domain OCT Instruments , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[35]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[36]  John Fox,et al.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework , 2011, Psychometrika.

[37]  Lucas Wexler,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Of Ocular Diseases , 2016 .