Large-scale bioenergy production from soybeans and switchgrass in Argentina: Part B. Environmental and socio-economic impacts on a regional level

The feasibility of deploying a socio-economic and environmental impact analysis for large-scale bioenergy production on a regional level is analyzed, based on a set of defined criteria and indicators. The analysis is done for La Pampa province in Argentina. The case study results in conclusions in how far the criteria can be verified ex ante based on available methodologies and data sources. The impacts are analyzed for two bioenergy chains (soybeans and switchgrass) for a set of defined land use scenarios. The carbon stock change for switchgrass ranges from 0.2 to 1.2 ton C/ha/year and for soybean from -1.2 to 0 ton C/ha/year, depending on the scenario. The GHG emission reduction ranges from 88% to 133% for the switchgrass bioenergy chain (replacing coal or natural gas) and from 16% to 94% for the soybean bioenergy chain (replacing fossil fuel) for various lifetime periods. The annual soil loss, compared to the reference land use system is 2-10 ton/ha for the soybean bioenergy chain and 1-2 ton/ha for the switchgrass bioenergy chain. In total, nine sustainability principles are analyzed. In the case of switchgrass, most environmental benefits can be achieved when produced on suitable land of abandoned cropland. Soybean production for bioenergy shows a good overall sustainability performance if produced on abandoned cropland. The production of switchgrass on degraded grassland shows socio-economic and environmental benefits, which is not the case for soybean production. The production of bioenergy production on non-degraded grassland is not preferred. It is concluded that the scenario approach enables understanding of the complexity of the bioenergy chain and the underlying factors influencing the sustainability principles. It is difficult to give ex ante a final conclusion whether a bioenergy chain is sustainable or not as this depends not only on the previous land use system but also on other factors as the selection of the bioenergy crop, the suitable agroecological zone and the agricultural management system applied. The results also imply that it is possible to steer for a large part the sustainability performance of a bioenergy chain during project development and implementation. Land use planning plays a key role in this process.

[1]  Stina Gustafsson,et al.  Sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: an expansion model sensitive to socioeconomic and environmental concerns , 2007 .

[2]  Jie Zhuang,et al.  Modeling the water use efficiency of soybean and maize plants under environmental stresses: application of a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior. , 2004, Journal of plant physiology.

[3]  Patrick Lamers.  Emerging liquid biofuel markets ¿A dónde va la Argentina? , 2006 .

[4]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .

[5]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy and water - the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. , 2002 .

[6]  André Faaij,et al.  The impact sustainability criteria on the costs and potentials of bioenergy production. An exploration of the impact of the implementation of sustainability criteria on the costs and potential of bioenergy production applied for case studies in Brazil and Ukraine , 2005 .

[7]  C. Raper,et al.  Nitrogen and Dry-Matter Partitioning in Soybean Plants During Onset of and Recovery from Nitrogen Stress , 1986, Botanical Gazette.

[8]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[9]  V. Owens,et al.  Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in established switchgrass land managed for biomass production , 2007 .

[10]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Comparison of growth and performance in upland and lowland switchgrass types to water and nitrogen stress. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[11]  John J Sheehan,et al.  Methodology for estimating removable quantities of agricultural residues for bioenergy and bioproduct use , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[12]  Joyeeta Gupta,et al.  CLIMATE CHANGE Scientific Assessment and Policy Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  William R Ocumpaugh,et al.  Developing Switchgrass as a Bioenergy Crop , 1998 .

[14]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean yields and soil water status in Argentina: Simulation analysis , 2007 .

[15]  J. P. Lesschen,et al.  Assessment of soil nutrient balance : approaches and methodologies , 2003 .

[16]  Mark A. Liebig,et al.  Soil carbon under switchgrass stands and cultivated cropland , 2005 .

[17]  A. Faaij,et al.  Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications , 2008 .

[18]  B. English,et al.  Estimating Agricultural Impacts of Expanded Ethanol Production: Policy Implications for Water Demand and Quality , 2008 .

[19]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first‐generation biofuels , 2009 .

[20]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Capturing latecomer advantages in the adoption of biofuels: The case of Argentina , 2009 .

[21]  P. Leffelaar,et al.  Which crop and which drop, and the scope for improvement of water productivity , 2005 .

[22]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  A spatially explicit methodology to quantify soil nutrient balances and their uncertainties at the national level , 2007, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[23]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting , 2009 .

[24]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[25]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Large-scale bioenergy production from soybeans and switchgrass in Argentina: Part A: Potential and economic feasibility for national and international markets , 2009 .

[26]  D. Francis,et al.  Crop Residue Type and Placement Effects on Denitrification and Mineralization , 1991 .

[27]  A. Faaij,et al.  A Greenhouse Gas Balance of two Existing International Biomass Import Chains , 2006 .

[28]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[29]  John H. Grove,et al.  A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Pampas of Argentina , 2002 .

[30]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Accounting for indirect land-use changes in GHG balances of biofuels , 2008 .

[31]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[32]  C. Busso.  Towards an increased and sustainable production in semi-arid rangelands of central Argentina: two decades of research☆ , 1997 .

[33]  J. Lingard,et al.  A conceptual model for conducting nutrient audits at national, regional, and global scales , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[34]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol - an assessment of the possibilities of certified production , 2007 .

[35]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[36]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Modeling nitrogen accumulation and use by soybean , 2003 .

[37]  A. Faaij,et al.  Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade , 2006 .

[38]  David C. Ditsch,et al.  A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops , 1998 .

[39]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[40]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[41]  E. Noellemeyer,et al.  Carbon Turnover and Carbon-13 Natural Abundance under Land Use Change in Semiarid Savanna Soils of La Pampa, Argentina , 2006 .

[42]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Greenhouse gas calculator for electricity and heat from biomass , 2008 .

[43]  Ignacio A. Ciampitti,et al.  Nitrous oxide emissions from soil during soybean [(Glycine max (L.) Merrill] crop phenological stages and stubbles decomposition period , 2008, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[44]  S. B. McLaughlin,et al.  Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. , 1995 .

[45]  E. Viglizzo,et al.  Ecological lessons and applications from one century of low external-input farming in the pampas of Argentina , 2001 .

[46]  Herman van Keulen,et al.  Biomass assessment : assessment of global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy: inventory and analysis of existing studies : supporting document , 2008 .

[47]  P Watson,et al.  Carbon reporting within the renewable transport fuel obligation - methodology , 2007 .