Non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity in vibration fatigue

Abstract In vibration fatigue, flexible structures operate at or close to their natural frequencies. Therefore, it is common to consider the input excitation as well as the stress/strain response of the structure to be Gaussian and stationary. In reality, a non-Gaussian and non-stationary excitation is frequently observed, resulting in a possibly non-Gaussian and non-stationary response. The importance of this non-Gaussianity (typically observed via the kurtosis) has resulted in significant research on the relevance of the Gaussian assumption in fatigue life. For dynamic structures the prior research was mainly theoretically and numerically focused. This work researches the importance of non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity theoretically, numerically and experimentally. Y-shaped specimens were used in this research. The excitation close to the natural frequency is random and in all the researched cases with the same power spectral density (PSD). While the PSD was kept the same, the rate of non-Gaussianity and the non-stationarity were changed. The results show that when the excitation is stationary and non-Gaussian, the fatigue life is not significantly impacted, and that standard frequency-counting methods are applicable. However, for the case of a non-stationary, non-Gaussian excitation, the fatigue life was found to be significantly impacted and the Gaussian theoretical approach is questionable.

[1]  J. K. Hammond.  Fundamentals of Signal Processing , 1999 .

[2]  Frédéric Kihm,et al.  Understanding How Kurtosis Is Transferred from Input Acceleration to Stress Response and Its Influence on Fatigue Llife , 2013 .

[3]  S. Winterstein.  Nonlinear Vibration Models for Extremes and Fatigue , 1988 .

[4]  Peter Wolfsteiner,et al.  Fatigue assessment of non-stationary random vibrations by using decomposition in Gaussian portions , 2017 .

[5]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Fourth Edition , 2010 .

[6]  O. Basquin.  The exponential law of endurance tests , 1910 .

[7]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[8]  Luca Landi,et al.  Random Loads Fatigue: The Use of Spectral Methods Within Multibody Simulation , 2005 .

[9]  André Preumont,et al.  Spectral methods for multiaxial random fatigue analysis of metallic structures , 2000 .

[10]  Denis Benasciutti.  Fatigue analysis of random loadings: A frequency-domain approach , 2012 .

[11]  Adam Niesłony,et al.  The Use of Spectral Method for Fatigue Life Assessment for Non-Gaussian Random Loads , 2016 .

[12]  Claudio Braccesi,et al.  A procedure for the virtual evaluation of the stress state of mechanical systems and components for the automotive industry: Development and experimental validation , 2005 .

[13]  Turan Dirlik,et al.  Application of computers in fatigue analysis , 1985 .

[14]  Nigel Barltrop,et al.  A new look at the effect of bandwidth and non-normality on fatigue damage , 2001 .

[15]  Hank Caruso.  MIL-STD-810F, Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests , 2001 .

[16]  Janko Slavič,et al.  A comparison of strain and classic experimental modal analysis , 2016 .

[17]  Janko Slavič,et al.  The use of strain sensors in an experimental modal analysis of small and light structures with free–free boundary conditions , 2013 .

[18]  D. Newland.  An introduction to random vibrations and spectral analysis , 1975 .

[19]  Ruijie Wang,et al.  Fatigue life prediction based on natural frequency changes for spot welds under random loading , 2009 .

[20]  Shahram Sarkani,et al.  Stochastic fatigue damage accumulation under broadband loadings , 1995 .

[21]  Janko Slavič,et al.  Uninterrupted and accelerated vibrational fatigue testing with simultaneous monitoring of the natural frequency and damping , 2012 .

[22]  Janko Slavič,et al.  Vibrational Fatigue and Structural Dynamics for Harmonic and Random Loads , 2013 .

[23]  D. Smallwood.  Generating Non-Gaussian Vibration for Testing Purposes , 2005 .

[24]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Probability Functions for Random Responses: Prediction of Peaks, Fatigue Damage, and Catastrophic Failures , 1964 .

[25]  Janko Slavič,et al.  Multiaxial vibration fatigue—A theoretical and experimental comparison , 2016 .

[26]  Giuliano Allegri,et al.  On the inverse power laws for accelerated random fatigue testing , 2008 .

[27]  Claudio Braccesi,et al.  Random multiaxial fatigue: A comparative analysis among selected frequency and time domain fatigue evaluation methods , 2015 .

[28]  Jwo Pan,et al.  Fatigue Testing and Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[29]  Janko Slavič,et al.  Frequency-domain methods for a vibration-fatigue-life estimation – Application to real data , 2013 .

[30]  Claudio Braccesi,et al.  The frequency domain approach in virtual fatigue estimation of non-linear systems: The problem of non-Gaussian states of stress , 2009 .

[31]  Stephen A. Rizzi,et al.  On the Response of a Nonlinear Structure to High Kurtosis Non-Gaussian Random Loadings , 2011 .

[32]  Denis Benasciutti,et al.  Recent developments in frequency domain multi-axial fatigue analysis , 2016 .