Forces involved in the assembly and stabilization of membrane proteins 1

Hydrophobic organization: Determination of the structure of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center, bacterial porins, and bacteriorhodopsin allows a comparison of the basic structural features of integral membrane proteins. Structure parameters of membrane‐ and water‐soluble proteins are surprisingly similar, given the different dielectric environments, except for the polarity of residues on the protein surface. Hydrophobic and electrostatic forces: 1) Intramembrane helix‐helix interactions that are sensitive to small structure changes can dictate assembly of membrane proteins, as indicated by reconstitution of bacteriorhodopsin from proteolytic fragments and specific dimer formation of the human erythrocyte sialoglycoprotein glycophorin A. 2) Electrostatic interactions have an important role in determining the trans‐membrane orientation of integral membrane proteins of the bacterial inner membrane, as expressed by the “positive‐inside” rule for the distribution of basic residues on the cis relative to the trans side of the membrane‐spanning α‐helices. The use of this charge asymmetry rule, in conjunction with a hydrophobicity algorithm for prediction of membrane‐spanning domains, allows accurate prediction of the folding patterns of such polypeptides across the membrane. A role of electrostatic interactions in assembly and maintenance of the structure of oligomeric integral membrane protein complexes is also implied by the separation and extrusion from the membrane, at high pH, of the major hydrophobic sub‐units of the cytochrome b6f complex from the chloroplast thylakoid membrane. It is inferred that the hydrophobic helix‐helix interactions between the subunits of this complex, whose function is electron transfer and proton translocation, are relatively weak compared to those in bacteriorhodopsin.— Cramer, W. A., Engelman, D. M., von Heijne, G, Rees, D. C. Forces involved in the assembly and stabilization of membrane proteins. FASEB J. 6: 3397‐3402; 1992.

[1]  D. Engelman,et al.  Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: the two-stage model. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[2]  T. Steitz,et al.  The spontaneous insertion of proteins into and across membranes: The helical hairpin hypothesis , 1981, Cell.

[3]  G. Feher,et al.  The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.

[4]  N. S. Gel’man [The molecular organization of biological membranes]. , 1967, Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii.

[5]  G. Schulz,et al.  The structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus at 1.8 Å resolution , 1991, FEBS letters.

[6]  O. El-Kabbani,et al.  Structure of the membrane-bound protein photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[7]  V. Marchesi,et al.  Subunit structure of human erythrocyte glycophorin A. , 1976, Biochemistry.

[8]  D Eisenberg,et al.  Hydrophobic organization of membrane proteins. , 1989, Science.

[9]  G. Rummel,et al.  Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins , 1992, Nature.

[10]  G. Heijne Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  S. High,et al.  Requirements for the membrane insertion of signal-anchor type proteins , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  Fine-tuning the topology of a polytopic membrane protein: Role of positively and negatively charged amino acids , 1990, Cell.

[13]  D. Rees,et al.  Membrane Protein Structure and Stability: Implications of the First Crystallographic Analyses , 1994 .

[14]  Sequence homology and structural similarity between cytochrome b of mitochondrial complex III and the chloroplast b6-f complex: position of the cytochrome b hemes in the membrane. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J Deisenhofer,et al.  Nobel lecture. The photosynthetic reaction centre from the purple bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[16]  T. W. Keenan,et al.  Electrostatic destabilization of the cytochrome b6f complex in the thylakoid membrane. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Werner K¨hlbrandt,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of plant light-harvesting complex determined by electron crystallography , 1991, Nature.

[18]  D. Engelman,et al.  Refolding of bacteriorhodopsin in lipid bilayers. A thermodynamically controlled two-stage process. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  G. Heijne The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans‐membrane topology , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[20]  G. Vonheijne,et al.  Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues , 1989, Nature.

[21]  C. Chothia,et al.  Helix to helix packing in proteins. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Engelman,et al.  Glycophorin A dimerization is driven by specific interactions between transmembrane alpha-helices. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  D. Engelman,et al.  Bacteriorhodopsin can be refolded from two independently stable transmembrane helices and the complementary five-helix fragment. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[24]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. , 1988, European journal of biochemistry.

[25]  W. Cramer,et al.  Thylakoid membrane protein topography. Location of the termini of the chloroplast cytochrome b6 on the stromal side of the membrane. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.