Two Forms of Spatial Imagery

Spatial imagery may be useful in such tasks as interpreting graphs and solving geometry problems, and even in performing surgery. This study provides evidence that spatial imagery is not a single faculty; rather, visualizing spatial location and mentally transforming location rely on distinct neural networks. Using 3-T functional magnetic resonance imaging, we tested 16 participants (8 male, 8 female) in each of two spatial imagery tasks—one that required visualizing location and one that required mentally rotating stimuli. The same stimuli were used in the two tasks. The location-based task engendered more activation near the occipito-parietal sulcus, medial posterior cingulate, and precuneus, whereas the transformation task engendered more activation in superior portions of the parietal lobe and in the postcentral gyrus. These differences in activation provide evidence that there are at least two different types of spatial imagery.

[1]  D. Levine,et al.  Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representation , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[3]  Wayne L Waag,et al.  Visual-spatial abilities of pilots , 1993 .

[4]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Distinct neural correlates of visual long-term memory for spatial location and object identity: a positron emission tomography study in humans. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[8]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural foundations of imagery , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms , 2001, Neuroreport.

[10]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[11]  S. Hamstra,et al.  Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills , 2002, The Lancet.

[12]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[13]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[14]  S. Kosslyn.  You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  S. Neggers,et al.  Brain areas involved in spatial working memory , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  The nature of memory related activity in early visual areas , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[18]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[19]  J. Zacks.  Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Training generalized spatial skills , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.