Spatial Dependence in Regressors and its Effect on Performance of Likelihood-Based and Instrumental Variable Estimators

Most spatial econometrics work focuses on spatial dependence in the regressand or disturbances. However, Lesage and Pace (2009) as well as Pace and LeSage2009 showed that the bias in β from applying OLS to a regressand generated from a spatial autoregressive process was exacerbated by spatial dependence in the regressor. Also, the marginal likelihood function or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) function includes a determinant term involving the regressors. Therefore, high dependence in the regressor may affect the likelihood through this term. In addition, Bowden and Turkington (1984) showed that regressor temporal autocorrelation had a non-monotonic effect on instrumental variable estimators. We provide empirical evidence that many common economic variables used as regressors (e.g., income, race, and employment) exhibit high levels of spatial dependence. Based on this observation, we conduct a Monte Carlo study of maximum likelihood (ML), REML and two instrumental variable specifications for spatial autoregressive (SAR) and spatial Durbin models (SDM) in the presence of spatially correlated regressors. Findings indicate that as spatial dependence in the regressor rises, REML outperforms ML and that performance of the instrumental variable methods suffer. The combination of correlated regressors and the SDM specification provides a challenging environment for instrumental variable techniques. We also examine estimates of marginal effects and show that these behave better than estimates of the underlying model parameters used to construct marginal effects estimates. Suggestions for improving design of Monte Carlo experiments are provided.

[1]  David A. Jaeger,et al.  Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak , 1995 .

[2]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  On the Large-Sample Estimation of Regression Models with Spatial- Or Network-Effects Terms: A Two-Stage Least Squares Approach , 1992 .

[3]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  Best Spatial Two‐Stage Least Squares Estimators for a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances , 2003 .

[4]  J. LeSage.  Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[5]  Paul F. Byrne.  Strategic interaction and the adoption of tax increment financing , 2005 .

[6]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air , 1978 .

[7]  T. Richards,et al.  Promotion and Fast Food Demand , 2009 .

[8]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[9]  Ronald P. Barry,et al.  Monte Carlo estimates of the log determinant of large sparse matrices , 1999 .

[10]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Specification and Estimation of Social Interaction Models with Network Structures , 2010 .

[11]  Antonio Páez,et al.  Progress in spatial analysis : methods and applications , 2009 .

[12]  Otis W. Gilley,et al.  On the Harrison and Rubinfeld Data , 1996 .

[13]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel L. Millimet,et al.  Strategic Competition Amongst Public Schools , 2004 .

[15]  H. Kelejian,et al.  A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances , 1998 .

[16]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[17]  Ronald P. Barry,et al.  Quick Computation of Spatial Autoregressive Estimators , 2010 .

[18]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  GMM and 2SLS estimation of mixed regressive, spatial autoregressive models , 2007 .

[19]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF A SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL WITH AUTOREGRESSIVE DISTURBANCES: LARGE AND SMALL SAMPLE RESULTS , 2004 .

[20]  K. Ord.  Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction , 1975 .