The Role of Canine Superficial Ventricular Muscle Fibers in Endocardial Impulse Distribution

Thin sections of canine right and left ventricular endocardium and myocardium were studied in a tissue bath to compare conduction properties of intraventricular specialized conducting tissue [Purkinje fibers (PF)], the superficial layers of subendocardial ventricular muscle (SVM), and the deeper ventricular muscle (DVM) below this level. The study was carried out because of observations that some areas of the endocardium, which are devoid of either specialized conducting tissue or of PF-VM junctions between specialized conducting tissue and ventricular muscle, conduct relatively rapidly, favoring specific orientations of propagation. Preparations containing PF, SVM, and DVM were studied electrophysiologically and histologically. A technique of stripping limited areas of endocardium was used to expose DVM in order to determine its intrinsic calculated conduction velocity. In 12 preparations, the average calculated conduction velocity in PF was 1.62 m/sec, and the average in DVM was 0.26 m/sec. The SVM conduction velocity was intermediate between the two, averaging 0.98 m/sec when propagation was parallel to SVM fiber orientation. Conduction velocity transverse to SVM fiber orientation was not significantly different from DVM conduction velocity. Histologically, the most superficial layers of VM were oriented uniformly in the direction of rapid subendocardial conduction, in contrast to DVM fibers in which orientation varied. It is concluded that the geometric arrangement of SVM fibers may provide a means for rapid subendocardial conduction and impulse distribution at a conduction velocity intermediate between PF and DVM in areas devoid of specialized conducting tissue.

[1]  I. Tanaka,et al.  On The Electrotonic Spread in Cardiac Muscle of the Mouse , 1966, The Journal of general physiology.

[2]  R. Myerburg,et al.  Digital monitoring of cardiac transmembrane potential characteristics. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  M H DRAPER,et al.  A comparison of the conduction velocity in cardiac tissues of various mammals. , 1959, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[4]  E. Andrus,et al.  Action of the Sympathetic Upon the Excitatory Process in the Dog's Heart. , 1927 .

[5]  Thomas Lewis,et al.  The excitatory process in the dog's heart. Part II The ventricles , 1915 .

[6]  D. L. Bassett,et al.  An engineering analysis of myocardial fiber orientation in pig's left ventricle in systole , 1966 .

[7]  R. Plonsey,et al.  A cellular model for the simulation of activation in the ventricular myocardium. , 1975, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  R. Pruitt,et al.  ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH LESIONS IN THE DEEPER LAYERS OF THE MYOCARDIUM AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1945 .

[9]  L. Clerc Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  H. Kulbertus,et al.  Pathological Basis of Concept of Left Hemiblock , 1978 .

[11]  T. Sano,et al.  Directional Difference of Conduction Velocity in the Cardiac Ventricular Syncytium Studied by Microelectrodes , 1959, Circulation research.

[12]  D. Glomset,et al.  A morphologic study of the cardiac conduction system in ungulates, dog, and man , 1940 .

[13]  R. Myerburg,et al.  Physiology of Canine Intraventricular Conduction and Endocardial Excitation , 1972, Circulation research.

[14]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Transverse spread and longitudinal dissociation in the distal A-V conducting system. , 1973, The Journal of clinical investigation.