Comparison of the Interrupting Capability of Gas Circuit Breaker According to SF6, g3, and CO2/O2 Mixture

In the study, an interrupting performance test on the 145 kV gas circuit breaker is performed according to three different gases: SF6, g3 (5% NovecTM4710 with 95% CO2), and CO2(70%)/O2(30%) gases. Thanks to research advancements, it is confirmed that CO2 and g3 (5% NovecTM 4710) gases, respectively, have 40% and 75% dielectric strength, compared to that of SF6 gas. The filling pressure and transient recovery voltage criteria of each gas were determined differently in order to compare the maximum interrupting performance of each gas. The pressure of SF6 gas was determined to be 5.5 bar, which is typically used in circuit breakers. The pressure of the other two gases was determined to be 8.0 bar (the maximum available pressure of the test circuit breaker) to find the maximum interrupting performance. Moreover, the rate-of-rise of transient recovery voltage of SF6 was determined as 10 kV/μs, which is the value at the state of maximum interrupting performance of the test circuit breaker with SF6. On the other hand, the rate-of-rise of transient recovery voltages of g3 (5% NovecTM4710 with 95% CO2) and CO2(70%)/O2(30%) gases were, respectively, determined as 4∼5 kV/μs to find the interruption available point. The characteristics of arc conductance, arc current, and arc voltage near the current zero, and post-arc current are analyzed to compare the interrupting performance, according to different arc-quenching gases. The arc current is measured using a current transformer (Rogowski coil), and a signal processing method of the arc current and arc voltage is introduced to increase the reliability of the interrupting performance results. As a result of the test, it is confirmed that the critical arc conductance for all test conditions converged within a certain range and the value is around 0.7 mS. In addition, the critical current slope just before the current zero-crossing during the interrupting process is shown to be 1.8 A/μs between interruption success and failure. Consequently, it is verified that the CO2(70%)/O2(30%) mixture and g3 (5% NovecTM4710 with 95% CO2) have a similar arc extinguishing performance and SF6 has a relatively higher extinguishing performance than that of CO2(70%)/O2(30%) mixture and g3 (5% NovecTM4710 with 95% CO2) under the aforementioned filling pressure and TRV conditions.

[1]  Xiaoxing Zhang,et al.  Research status of replacement gases for SF6 in power industry , 2020 .

[2]  G. Wilson,et al.  AC Volume Breakdown and Surface Flashover of a 4% NovecTM 4710/96% CO2 Gas Mixture Compared to CO2 in Highly Nonhomogeneous Fields , 2020, Energies.

[3]  Wei Xie,et al.  Investigation on Dielectric Recovery Characteristics of CO2 Gas Circuit Breakers With Current Commutation Regulation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[4]  Yi Li,et al.  Assessment on the toxicity and application risk of C4F7N: A new SF6 alternative gas. , 2019, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Xingwen Li,et al.  Study of the Arc Interruption Performance of CO2 Gas in High-Voltage Circuit Breaker , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[6]  A. Xiao,et al.  Environmentally Friendly Insulating Gases as SF6 Alternatives for Power Utilities , 2019, 2019 2nd International Conference on Electrical Materials and Power Equipment (ICEMPE).

[7]  Yang Cao,et al.  Fluoronitrile/CO2 mixture as an eco-friendly alternative to SF6 for medium voltage switchgears , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[8]  M. Rong,et al.  Comparison of dielectric breakdown properties for different carbon-fluoride insulating gases as SF6 alternatives , 2018, AIP Advances.

[9]  C. Doiron,et al.  Mixtures of CO2 and C5F10O perfluoroketone for high voltage applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[10]  Yingsan Geng,et al.  Simulation of the decomposition pathways and products of Perfluoronitrile C4F7N (3M:Novec 4710 , 2017, 2017 4th International Conference on Electric Power Equipment - Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST).

[11]  A. Haddad,et al.  CF3I Gas Mixtures: Breakdown Characteristics and Potential for Electrical Insulation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  A. Beroual,et al.  Fluoronitriles/CO2 gas mixture as promising substitute to SF6 for insulation in high voltage applications , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[13]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Study of the arc interruption performance of SF6-CO2 mixtures as a substitute for SF6 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[14]  Yannick Kieffel,et al.  Green Gas to Replace SF6 in Electrical Grids , 2016, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[15]  Zheng Xu,et al.  Investigation on the reduced critical breakdown field of hot CO2 gas and CO2-based mixtures , 2015, 2015 3rd International Conference on Electric Power Equipment – Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST).

[16]  S. Jia,et al.  Prediction of the critical reduced electric field strength for carbon dioxide and its mixtures with copper vapor from Boltzmann analysis for a gas temperature range of 300 K to 4000 K at 0.4 MPa , 2015 .

[17]  M. Seeger,et al.  ${\rm CO}_{2}$ as an Arc Interruption Medium in Gas Circuit Breakers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[18]  R.P.P. Smeets,et al.  Performance evaluation of high-voltage circuit breakers by means of current zero analysis , 2002, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[19]  R. Meier,et al.  Investigations of Nozzle Materials in SF6 Circuit Breakers , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[20]  Katsumi Suzuki,et al.  Fundamental Research on SF 6-free Gas Insulated Switchgear Adopting CO 2 Gas and Its Mixtures , 2007 .