Risk analysis and safety assessment in surgical robotics: A case study on a biopsy robot

One of the most important issues in medical robotics is safety and integration into the clinical workflow. If a robot is not safe and its use is complicated by difficult handling and complex user interfaces physicians would not use a robotic system during clinical patient trials, whatever the other advantages are. However, there are only few publications on this topic, in particular on risk management in developing a robotic prototype (for clinical trials). In this paper risk management and the safety of using robot‐assisted surgery equipment are discussed and demonstrated exemplarily in the process of developing a prototype biopsy robot.

[1]  Michael Figl,et al.  Robotic guidance for percutaneous interventions , 2003, Adv. Robotics.

[2]  J. Kettenbach,et al.  Robot-assisted biopsy using ultrasound guidance: initial results from in vitro tests , 2005, European Radiology.

[3]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Danielle Giroud.  A revised guideline for medical device clinical investigations: ISO 14155 Part 1 and 2: 2003 , 2004 .

[5]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Risk management for a robot-assisted needle positioning system for interventional radiology , 2004, CARS.

[6]  Ken Masamune,et al.  System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[7]  P. A. C. Varley.  Techniques for development of safety-related software for surgical robots , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[8]  Jörg Raczkowsky,et al.  Risk analysis for a reliable and safe surgical robot system , 2003, CARS.

[9]  E. Lerner.  Computer-integrated surgery. , 1997, New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.

[10]  Heinz Wörn,et al.  A safe robot system for craniofacial surgery , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[11]  Tim Lüth,et al.  RoboPoint - an autoclavable interactive miniature robot for surgery and interventional radiology , 2003, CARS.

[12]  A. Dessl,et al.  A novel vacuum device for extremity immobilisation during digital angiography: preliminary clinical experiences , 2002, European Radiology.

[13]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Robotically assisted nerve and facet blocks: a cadaveric study. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[14]  Ramin Shahidi,et al.  Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  B. Davies.  A review of robotics in surgery , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  P Kazanzides,et al.  Safety considerations in a surgical robot. , 1993, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[17]  Heinz Wörn,et al.  SAFETY OF SURGICAL ROBOTS IN CLINICAL TRIALS , 2004 .

[18]  C. K. Tan,et al.  On safety enhancements for medical robots , 1996 .