Abstract Energy use scenario and resulting rice yield of 576 farms belonging to six agroclimatic zones of Assam, India were investigated. Input energy from eight distinct sources, viz ., human, animal, diesel, commercial chemical fertilizer, farm yard manure (FYM), seed, pesticide chemical and machinery were determined on the basis of collected data and using standard procedure. Based on the power sources used and application of commercial chemical fertilizer, four categories of farms were delineated: (i) animal power without commercial fertilizer (APNF), (ii) animal power with commercial fertilizer (APF), (iii) mechanical power without commercial fertilizer (MPNF) and (iv) mechanical power with commercial fertilizer (MPF). The best-fit curve of energy versus yield indicated that use of commercial chemical fertilizer and mechanical power resulted in higher rice yield at higher level of input energy. Moreover, as the use of energy increased the yield increased up to maxima and then declined at higher levels of energy. This was observed in all four categories of farms with variation in yield–energy values. The average values of energy input (MJ ha −1 ) and corresponding yield (kg ha −1 ) for the APNF, APF, MPNF and MPF type of farms were (5220, 1980); (9050, 3170); (5100, 2360) and (8320, 3800), respectively. Renewable energy dominated the rice cultivation in Assam contributing more than 50% of the total input energy with the exception of MPF category of farm where share of renewable and non-renewable were found to be almost equal. Among the farm operations, tillage was the highest energy consuming operation followed by threshing, harvesting and transplanting for all four categories of farms. However, it was observed that rice yield was not positively correlated with tillage energy.
[1]
Chunxue Han,et al.
Energy analysis of advanced collective farms in North China
,
1985
.
[2]
M. Nguyen,et al.
Energy and labour efficiency for three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand
,
1995
.
[3]
A. Franzluebbers,et al.
Energy output:input ratio of maize and sorghum management systems in eastern Nebraska
,
1995
.
[4]
R. Zentner,et al.
Effects of tillage method and crop rotation on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin Black Chernozem in the Canadian Prairies.
,
2004
.
[5]
D. Zoebl.
Patterns of input-output relations in agro-ecosystems
,
2000
.
[6]
Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.
Resource degradation, technical change, and the productivity of energy use in U.S. agriculture
,
1995
.
[7]
Clarence J. Swanton,et al.
Recent improvements in the energy efficiency of agriculture: Case studies from Ontario, Canada
,
1996
.
[8]
Guriqbal Singh,et al.
Field performance evaluation of a manual rice transplanter
,
1985
.
[9]
Douglas J. Reinemann,et al.
Low-input sustainable agriculture using ecological management practices☆
,
1989
.
[10]
D. C Baruah,et al.
Present status and future demand for energy for bullock-operated paddy-farms in Assam (India)
,
2004
.
[11]
D. Hume,et al.
Energy analysis of tillage and herbicide inputs in alternative weed management systems
,
1995
.
[12]
Energy comparison in three cases of pesticide versus bio-control pest management
,
1983
.