A variational-based homogenization model for plastic shakedown analysis of porous materials with a large range of porosity

Abstract In this paper, a new homogenization model is developed for the determination of macroscopic shakedown limit state for porous media subjected to general cyclic loads. Based on the variational principle over the stabilized cycle, a new macroscopic fatigue criterion is established, beyond which the collapse of material will occur due to fatigue. Unlike the classical Melan’s theory by statical approaches relying on the complex construction of a time-independent residual stress field, the formulation of the new criterion is derived from a variational-based kinematical approach which allows overcoming this difficulty. Dirac’s measure is adopted to simplify the volume integral with the assumption of vanishing plastic strain increment over a stabilized cycle. The established criteria exhibit directly the dependence of the plastic shakedown limit load on the invariants of the macroscopic stress tensor, Poisson’s ratio of the solid matrix and the porosity. The macroscopic safety domain is defined by the intersection of limit surface of this new fatigue criteria and that corresponds to the incremental collapse which is reached monotonically. The theoretical predictions of shakedown limits by the new criterion are compared with the numerical results obtained from non-linear optimization method and with those given by some representative existing criteria. It is shown that the new criterion significantly improves the accuracy of plastic shakedown limit prediction for porous materials with large values of porosity.

[1]  R. Lebensohn,et al.  On the Combined Effect of Pressure and Third Invariant on Yielding of Porous Solids With von Mises Matrix , 2013 .

[2]  Jean-Baptiste Leblond,et al.  Recent extensions of Gurson's model for porous ductile metals , 1997 .

[3]  M. Wang,et al.  Application of three-dimensional shakedown solutions in railway structure under multiple Hertz loads , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  A. Sawczuk Evaluation of upper bounds to shakedown loads for shells , 1969 .

[5]  Wang Duo,et al.  A lower bound approach to the yield loci of porous materials , 1989 .

[6]  J. Shao,et al.  A micro–macro model for clayey rocks with a plastic compressible porous matrix , 2012 .

[7]  Ying Hui Cao,et al.  Prediction of plastic yield surface for porous materials by a machine learning approach , 2020 .

[8]  G. Saxcé,et al.  Shakedown of porous materials , 2017 .

[9]  G. Saxcé,et al.  Shakedown analysis of a hollow sphere by interior-point method with non-linear optimization , 2020, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[10]  F. Schubert,et al.  Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments , 2003 .

[11]  K Dang-Van,et al.  Macro-Micro Approach in High-Cycle Multiaxial Fatigue , 1993 .

[13]  Michel Save,et al.  Plastic Limit Analysis of Plates, Shells and Disks , 2011 .

[14]  J. Zhang,et al.  A homogenized macroscopic criterion for shakedown analysis of ductile porous media with kinematical hardening matrix , 2020 .

[15]  A. Gurson Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth: Part I—Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Porous Ductile Media , 1977 .

[16]  J. Zhang,et al.  Cyclic inelastic behavior and shakedown response of a 2nd generation nickel-base single crystal superalloy under tension-torsion loadings: Experiments and simulations , 2020 .

[17]  Jun Shen,et al.  Shakedown analysis of engineering structures under multiple variable mechanical and thermal loads using the stress compensation method , 2018 .

[18]  P. Hölscher,et al.  Long-term deformation of railway tracks considering train-track interaction and non-linear resilient behaviour of aggregates – a 3D FEM implementation , 2020 .

[19]  S. Manson Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress , 1953 .

[20]  G. Saxcé,et al.  A stress-based variational model for ductile porous materials , 2014 .

[21]  V. monchiet,et al.  An improvement of Gurson-type models of porous materials by using Eshelby-like trial velocity fields , 2007 .

[22]  Jean-Baptiste Leblond,et al.  Approximate models for ductile metals containing non-spherical voids—Case of axisymmetric prolate ellipsoidal cavities , 1993 .

[23]  A. Benzerga,et al.  A constitutive model for plastically anisotropic solids with non-spherical voids , 2010 .

[24]  V. Tvergaard Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions , 1981 .

[25]  Xiaotao Zheng,et al.  Shakedown boundaries of multilayered thermal barrier systems considering interface imperfections , 2018, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[26]  Dieter Weichert,et al.  Inelastic behaviour of structures under variable repeated loads : direct analysis methods , 2002 .

[27]  C. Shih,et al.  Continuum modeling of a porous solid with pressure-sensitive dilatant matrix , 2008 .

[28]  G. Saxcé,et al.  Macroscopic criterion for ductile porous materials based on a statically admissible microscopic stress field , 2015 .

[29]  W. T. Koiter General theorems for elastic plastic solids , 1960 .

[30]  Rongqiao Wang,et al.  Constitutive modelling of ratcheting behaviour for nickel-based single crystal superalloy under thermomechanical fatigue loading considering microstructure evolution , 2020 .

[31]  A. Needleman,et al.  Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar , 1984 .

[32]  P. Suquet,et al.  Effective properties of porous ideally plastic or viscoplastic materials containing rigid particles , 1997 .

[33]  D. Kondo,et al.  Limit Analysis and computational modeling of the hollow sphere model with a Mises–Schleicher matrix , 2013 .

[34]  A. Constantinescu,et al.  On void shape effects of periodic elasto-plastic materials subjected to cyclic loading , 2015 .

[35]  G. Saxcé,et al.  A bipotential-based limit analysis and homogenization of ductile porous materials with non-associated Drucker–Prager matrix , 2015 .

[36]  O. Cazacu,et al.  Analytic plastic potential for porous aggregates with matrix exhibiting tension-compression asymmetry , 2009 .

[37]  Li Cheng,et al.  Void interaction and coalescence in polymeric materials , 2007 .

[38]  Lele Zhang,et al.  A numerical shakedown analysis method for strength evaluation coupling with kinematical hardening based on two surface model , 2019, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[39]  Michael Smith,et al.  ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, Version 6.9 , 2009 .

[40]  T. M. Mostofi,et al.  Structural response of monolithic and multi-layered circular metallic plates under repeated uniformly distributed impulsive loading: An experimental study , 2020 .

[41]  Rodney Hill,et al.  A VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM PLASTIC WORK IN CLASSICAL PLASTICITY , 1948 .

[42]  Hu Hui,et al.  Numerical limit and shakedown analysis method for kinematic hardening structure made of arbitrary inhomogeneous material , 2020 .

[43]  On shakedown of three-dimensional elastoplastic strain-hardening structures , 1996 .

[44]  J. Zhang,et al.  A macroscopic criterion of shakedown limit for ductile porous materials subjected to general cyclic loadings , 2017 .

[45]  R. J. Green,et al.  A plasticity theory for porous solids , 1972 .

[46]  Hideo Kobayashi,et al.  The cyclic J-R curve and upper-limit characteristic of fatigue-crack growth in 212 CrMo steel , 1992 .

[47]  A Variational Deduction of the Upper and Lower Bound Shakedown Theorems by Markov and Hill’s Principles Over a Cycle , 1995 .

[48]  Yuguo Sun,et al.  Analysis of shear localization in porous materials based on a lower bound approach , 1995 .

[49]  G. Saxcé,et al.  Shakedown of porous material with Drucker-Prager dilatant matrix under general cyclic loadings , 2019, Composite Structures.

[50]  N. Cho,et al.  Cyclic plasticity and creep-cyclic plasticity behaviours of the SiC/Ti-6242 particulate reinforced titanium matrix composites under thermo-mechanical loadings , 2019, Composite Structures.

[51]  J. Shao,et al.  Numerical homogenization of elastic properties and plastic yield stress of rock-like materials with voids and inclusions at same scale , 2020 .

[52]  Jacques Besson,et al.  Plastic potentials for anisotropic porous solids , 2001 .

[53]  J. Leblond,et al.  A Gurson-type criterion for porous ductile solids containing arbitrary ellipsoidal voids—I: Limit-analysis of some representative cell , 2012 .

[54]  Dieter Weichert,et al.  A Historical View on Shakedown Theory , 2014 .

[55]  Hyun-Yong Jeong A new yield function and a hydrostatic stress-controlled void nucleation model for porous solids with pressure-sensitive matrices , 2002 .

[56]  V. monchiet,et al.  Macroscopic yield criteria for plastic anisotropic materials containing spheroidal voids , 2008 .

[57]  J. Leblond,et al.  Numerical study and theoretical modelling of void growth in porous ductile materials subjected to cyclic loadings , 2016 .

[58]  Ali Chaaba,et al.  A new approach to shakedown analysis for non-standard elastoplastic material by the bipotential , 2003 .

[59]  J. Qian,et al.  Dynamic shakedown analysis of two-layered pavement under rolling-sliding contact , 2020 .

[60]  Limit analysis and homogenization of porous materials with Mohr–Coulomb matrix. Part I: Theoretical formulation , 2016 .

[61]  An analytical Lode angle dependent damage model for ductile porous materials , 2015 .

[62]  Jan A. König,et al.  Shakedown of Elastic-Plastic Structures , 1987 .

[63]  V. monchiet,et al.  Combined voids size and shape effects on the macroscopic criterion of ductile nanoporous materials , 2013 .

[64]  N. Burlion,et al.  Influences of micro-pores and meso-pores on elastic and plastic properties of porous materials , 2018, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids.

[65]  I. Roman,et al.  Concept of the limit yield condition in shakedown theory , 1997 .