Communicating Corporate Ethos on the Web

This research examines credibility in the discourse offered on the corporate Web sites of 60 British, Danish, and Norwegian public relations (PR) agencies. This study’s purpose was to see whether the North European PR industry moves in the direction of convergence or divergence in their corporate self-presentations. The authors have done this by unfolding the rhetoric and language of PR agencies Web sites. In this process, this study tried to determine whether the rhetorical strategies they use to achieve credibility show signs across the industry of becoming more focused on the responsibilities, enthusiasm, and caring nature of corporations and less directed at communicating expertise. Thus, the study expected to show whether PR agencies seek to build credibility by way of much the same rhetorical strategies and language, or whether they pursue different strategies in trying to build unique images. In analyzing the data, it is found that PR agencies across the three countries assign similar relative importance to expertise, trustworthiness, and empathy, and interestingly also that they strongly prioritize explaining their expertise at the expense of expressing their empathy for clients. To begin to understand this reluctance toward incorporating empathy in discourse, the authors investigate the linguistic representation of this one central dimension to explain its complexity and to point to the potential of an untapped resource for strategically managing self-presentation in business communication.

[1]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Essentials of Corporate Communication: Implementing Practices for Effective Reputation Management , 2007 .

[2]  Barry Edward Eckhouse Competitive Communication: A Rhetoric for Modern Business , 1998 .

[3]  Maria Isaksson,et al.  The Rhetoric of Corporate Mission Statements: Virtues and Emotions for the Market , 2010 .

[4]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[5]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[6]  M. Mcnamee,et al.  A Rhetoric of Motives , 1951 .

[7]  Dale L. Sullivan The ethos of epideictic encounter , 1993 .

[8]  L. Beason Strategies for Establishing an Effective Persona: an Analysis of Appeals to Ethos in Business Speeches , 1991 .

[9]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[10]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  An introduction to communication in the classroom , 1992 .

[11]  S. B. Kenton Speaker Credibility in Persuasive Business Communication , 1989 .

[12]  The Figures of Speech, Ethos, and Aristotle: Notes Toward a Rhetoric of Business Communication , 1985 .

[13]  Giambattista Vico The Art of Rhetoric , 1996 .

[14]  Linda Williams The Mission Statement: A Corporate Reporting Tool With a Past, Present, and Future , 2008 .

[15]  Barbara Warnick Source Credibility in an "Authorless" Environment , 2010 .

[16]  Dorien Van De Mieroop,et al.  The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity , 2007 .

[17]  Arild Wæraas,et al.  Green legitimation: the construction of an environmental ethos , 2009 .

[18]  P. Jørgensen,et al.  Building credibility in international banking and financial markets , 2008 .

[19]  A. A. Lumsdaine Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[20]  Aristotle,et al.  The Art of Rhetoric , 1924 .

[21]  Louis H. Amato,et al.  Corporate Commitment to Quality of Life: Evidence from Company Mission Statements , 2002 .

[22]  Pernille Schnoor Brand Ethos: Om troværdige brand- og virksomhedsidentiteter i et retorisk og diskursteoretisk perspektiv , 2004 .