Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot study.

RATIONALE AND AIMS Numerous prevalence studies have been conducted. The problem with these studies is that prevalence proportions cannot be compared with each other, because of differences in performance of each survey. There is no agreed standardized method for determining prevalence proportions. This study aimed to develop and pilot a uniform data collection instrument and methodology to measure the pressure ulcer prevalence and to get some insight into pressure ulcer prevalence across different patient groups in Europe. METHODS Pressure ulcer experts from different European countries developed a data collection instrument, which included five categories of data: general data, patient data, risk assessment, skin observation and prevention. A convenience sample of university and general hospitals of Belgium, Italy, Portugal, UK and Sweden participated in the study. In each participating hospital, teams of two trained nurses who collected the data on the wards were established. All patients admitted before midnight on the day of the survey and older than 18 years were included. RESULTS The data collection instrument and study procedure of the survey were found to be effective by all participants. 5947 patients were surveyed in 25 hospitals in five European countries. The pressure ulcer prevalence (grade 1-4) was 18.1% and if grade 1 ulcers were excluded, it was 10.5%. The sacrum and heels were the most affected locations. Only 9.7% of the patients in need of prevention received fully adequate preventive care. CONCLUSION The methodology is sufficiently robust to measure and compare pressure ulcer prevalence in different countries. The pressure ulcer prevalence was higher than expected and relatively few patients received adequate prevention. This indicates that more attention to prevention is needed in Europe.

[1]  Tom Defloor,et al.  Effectiveness of an alternating pressure air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers. , 2005, Age and ageing.

[2]  R. Halfens,et al.  Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[3]  R. Briones,et al.  National Prevalence and Incidence Study: 6‐Year Sequential Acute Care Data , 2004, Advances in skin & wound care.

[4]  M. G. Woodbury,et al.  Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian healthcare settings. , 2004, Ostomy/wound management.

[5]  Antje Tannen,et al.  A comparison of pressure ulcer prevalence: concerted data collection in the Netherlands and Germany. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[6]  J. Posnett,et al.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. , 2004, Age and ageing.

[7]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  H. Abu‐Saad,et al.  Prevalence, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers: descriptive study in 89 institutions in the Netherlands. , 2002, Research in nursing & health.

[9]  L. Gunningberg,et al.  Reduced incidence of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures: a 2-year follow-up of quality indicators. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  W. Graham,et al.  The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  M. Patrick,et al.  A National Study of Pressure Ulcer Prevalence and Incidence in Acute Care Hospitals , 2000, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[12]  T. Defloor,et al.  Sitting posture and prevention of pressure ulcers. , 1999, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[13]  Á. Thoroddsen,et al.  Pressure sore prevalence: a national survey. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[14]  T. Defloor,et al.  The risk of pressure sores: a conceptual scheme. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[15]  J. Maklebust Pressure ulcer assessment. , 1997, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[16]  M Lee,et al.  A wheelchair cushion designed to redistribute sites of sitting pressure. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  G. Xakellis,et al.  Cost of Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long‐Term Care , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. , 1994, Research in nursing & health.

[19]  M. Edwards The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  Dirk De Bacquer,et al.  The effect of various combinations of turning and pressure reducing devices on the incidence of pressure ulcers. , 2005, International journal of nursing studies.