Five-year results of randomized bioactive versus bare metal coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Matrix and Platinum Science (MAPS) Trial

Background No randomized trial of intracranial aneurysm coiling has compared long-term efficacy of polymer-modified coils to bare metal coils (BMCs). We report 5-year results comparing Matrix2 coils to BMCs. The primary objective was to compare the rates of target aneurysm recurrence (TAR) at 12 months. Secondary objectives included angiographic outcomes at TAR or 12 months and TAR at 5 years. Methods A total of 626 patients were randomized to BMCs or Matrix2 coils. Detailed methods and 1-year results have been published previously. Results Of 580 patients eligible for 5-year follow-up, 431 (74.3%) completed follow-up or reached TAR. Matrix2 coils were non-inferior to BMCs (P=0.8) but did not confer any benefit. Core lab reported post-treatment residual aneurysm filling (Raymond III) correlated with TAR (P<0.0001) and with aneurysm hemorrhage after treatment (P<0.008). Repeat aneurysmal hemorrhage after treatment, but before hospital discharge, occurred in three patients treated for acutely ruptured aneurysms. Additionally, two patients treated for unruptured aneurysms experienced a first hemorrhage during follow-up. All five hemorrhages resulted from aneurysms with Raymond III residual aneurysm filling persisting after initial treatment. After 5 years follow-up, 2/626 (0.3%) patients are known to have had target aneurysm rupture following hospital discharge. The annualized rate of delayed hemorrhage after coiling was 2/398/5=0.001 (0.1%) per year for unruptured aneurysms and 0 for ruptured aneurysms. Conclusions After 5 years Matrix2 coils were non-inferior to BMCs but no benefit was demonstrated. Post-treatment residual angiographic aneurysm filling (Raymond III) is strongly associated with TAR (P<0.0001) and post-treatment aneurysmal hemorrhage (P=0.008).

[1]  J. Carpenter,et al.  The Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HEAT): A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Second-Generation Hydrogel Coil , 2020, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[3]  P. Courtheoux,et al.  Second-Generation Hydrogel Coils for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms , 2018, Stroke.

[4]  J. Mocco,et al.  Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  J. Mocco,et al.  Geographic Differences in Endovascular Treatment and Retreatment of Cerebral Aneurysms , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  A. Molyneux,et al.  Risk Analysis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study , 2016, Stroke.

[7]  A. Molyneux,et al.  Bioactive versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  R. Spetzler,et al.  The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  Validation of a System to Predict Recanalization After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[10]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  Intracranial Aneurysms: Recurrences More than 10 Years after Endovascular Treatment-A Prospective Cohort Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis. , 2015, Radiology.

[11]  W. Poncyljusz,et al.  Bare platinum coils vs. HydroCoil in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms-A single center randomized controlled study. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[12]  J. Mocco,et al.  Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  A. Fox,et al.  Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  J. Mocco,et al.  Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling Alone in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  U. Dafni,et al.  Informed Choice of Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Trials , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[16]  A. Fox,et al.  Differences in the Angiographic Evaluation of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms between a Core Laboratory Reader and Operators: Results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  W. Taki,et al.  Importance of independent evaluation of initial anatomic results after endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms , 2013, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Fox,et al.  Cerecyte Coil Trial: Angiographic Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms With Either Cerecyte or Bare Platinum Coils , 2012, Stroke.

[19]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[20]  Jacqueline Birks,et al.  Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[21]  J. Lamoureux,et al.  Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils , 2003, Stroke.