Improved estimation of the pair correlation function of random sets

The texture of binary spatial structures can be characterized by second‐order methods of spatial statistics. The pair correlation function, which describes the structure in terms of spatial correlation as a function of distance, is of central importance in this context. Conventionally, the pair correlation function of stationary and isotropic random sets is estimated as the ratio of the covariance to the square of volume fraction of the phase of interest. In the present paper, an improved estimator of the pair correlation function is presented, where the covariance is divided by the square of a distance‐adapted estimator of volume fraction. The new estimator is explained mathematically and applied to simulated images of the Boolean model and to microscopic images from neoplastic and non‐neoplastic human glandular tissues. It leads to a considerable reduction of bias and variance of estimated pair correlation functions, in particular for large distances.

[1]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Binary Mosaics and the Spatial Pattern of Heather , 1981 .

[2]  R. Hilfer,et al.  Reconstruction of random media using Monte Carlo methods. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[3]  S. Torquato,et al.  Reconstructing random media. II. Three-dimensional media from two-dimensional cuts , 1998 .

[4]  Reed,et al.  Stereological estimation of covariance using linear dipole probes , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Inter‐animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[7]  T. Mattfeldt,et al.  Centred contact density functions for the statistical analysis of random sets A stereological study on benign and malignant glandular tissue using image analysis , 1996, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[9]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stereological estimation of the radial distribution function of centres of spheres , 1981 .

[10]  B. Hambly Fractals, random shapes, and point fields , 1994 .

[11]  Hans Jørgen G. Gundersen,et al.  Second-order stereology , 1990 .

[12]  Heinrich Statistics of the Boolean Model for Practitioners and Mathematicians , 1998 .

[13]  T. Mattfeldt,et al.  Second‐order stereology of benign and malignant alterations of the human mammary gland , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Improving Ratio Estimators of Second Order Point Process Characteristics , 2000 .

[15]  Mayhew Second‐order stereology and ultrastructural examination of the spatial arrangements of tissue compartments within glomeruli of normal and diabetic kidneys , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  S. Torquato,et al.  Reconstructing random media , 1998 .

[17]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[18]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Stereology for pores in wheat bread: statistical analyses for the Boolean model by serial sections , 1991 .

[19]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Computerized characterization of the geometry of real porous media: their discretization, analysis and interpretation , 1993 .

[20]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  D. Jeulin Random models for morphological analysis of powders , 1993 .