Quantitative study of electroporation-mediated molecular uptake and cell viability.

Electroporation's use for laboratory transfection and clinical chemotherapy is limited by an incomplete understanding of the effects of electroporation parameters on molecular uptake and cell viability. To address this need, uptake of calcein and viability of DU 145 prostate cancer cells were quantified using flow cytometry for more than 200 different combinations of experimental conditions. The experimental parameters included field strength (0.1-3.3 kV/cm), pulse length (0.05-20 ms), number of pulses (1-10), calcein concentration (10-100 microM), and cell concentration (0.6-23% by volume). These data indicate that neither electrical charge nor energy was a good predictor of electroporation's effects. Instead, both uptake and viability showed a complex dependence on field strength, pulse length, and number of pulses. The effect of cell concentration was explained quantitatively by electric field perturbations caused by neighboring cells. Uptake was shown to vary linearly with external calcein concentration. This large quantitative data set may be used to optimize electroporation protocols, test theoretical models, and guide mechanistic interpretations.

[1]  Charles Polk,et al.  CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields , 1986 .

[2]  J Teissié,et al.  Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells. Quantitative analysis of the phenomenon. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[3]  J. Weaver,et al.  A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[4]  P. T. Lynch,et al.  Electrical Manipulation of Cells , 1996, Springer US.

[5]  M. Jutila,et al.  Characterization of peptide diffusion into electropermeabilized neutrophils. , 1996, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  S. Orlowski,et al.  Mechanisms of electrochemotherapy. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[7]  Howard M. Shapiro,et al.  Practical Flow Cytometry , 1985 .

[8]  E. Neumann,et al.  Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology , 1989, Springer US.

[9]  L. Mir,et al.  Voltage-dependent introduction of a d[α]octothymidylate into electropermeabilized cells , 1989 .

[10]  S. Hui,et al.  Effects of pulse length and pulse strength on transfection by electroporation. , 1990, BioTechniques.

[11]  J. Weaver,et al.  The number of molecules taken up by electroporated cells: quantitative determination , 1989, FEBS letters.

[12]  M. Jaroszeski,et al.  Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  D. Stenger,et al.  Uptake of fluorescence-labeled dextrans by 10T 1/2 fibroblasts following permeation by rectangular and exponential-decay electric field pulses. , 1988, BioTechniques.

[14]  D. Chang,et al.  Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion , 1991 .

[15]  E Neumann,et al.  Mechanism of electroporative dye uptake by mouse B cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[16]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Determination of the electric field and anomalous heating caused by exponential pulses with aluminum electrodes in electroporation experiments , 1996 .

[17]  J. A. Gimm,et al.  Quantitative study of molecular transport due to electroporation: uptake of bovine serum albumin by erythrocyte ghosts. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electric Field-Induced Transmembrane Potential Depends on Cell Density and Organizatio , 1998 .

[19]  M. Essand,et al.  Radioimmunotherapy of prostatic adenocarcinomas: Effects of 131I‐labelled E4 antibodies on cells at different depth in DU 145 spheroids , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[20]  Richard P. Haugland,et al.  Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals , 1996 .

[21]  J. Weaver,et al.  Observation of extremely heterogeneous electroporative molecular uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae which changes with electric field pulse amplitude. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  Jac A. Nickoloff,et al.  Animal cell electroporation and electrofusion protocols , 1995 .