Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotype in healthy Chinese subjects

AbstractAim:To investigate whether the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole are dependent on CYP2C19 genotype status in healthy Chinese Han subjects.Methods:The CYP2C19 genotype status of healthy Chinese Han volunteers was determined using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Twenty healthy subjects volunteered to participate in the study. There were seven homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEM), six heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEM), and seven poor metabolizers (PM). All subjects were Helicobactor pylori-negative, which was determined by serology and 13C-urea breath tests. Rabeprazole (20 mg) was taken orally once daily in the morning for 8 days, and intragastric pH values were monitored for 24 h by Digitrapper pH after day 1 (single dose) and day 8 (repeated dose). Meanwhile, blood samples were collected at various time-points for 24 h after administration. The serum concentrations of rabeprazole were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.Results:The mean area under the curve (AUC) values for rabeprazole differed among the three different genotype groups, with a relative ratio of 1.0, 1.3, and 1.8 after a single dose and 1.0, 1.1, and 1.7 after repeated doses in the homEM, hetEM, and PM groups, respectively. Mean AUC values for rabeprazole after a single dose and after repeated doses were significantly different between the homEM and PM groups, but not between the homEM and hetEM or hetEM and PM groups. No significant differences in intragastric pH median, pH>4 total time, and pH>4 time percentage of 24 h, were observed among the three different genotype groups after a single dose or after repeated doses of rabeprazole.Conclusion:In healthy Chinese Han subjects, the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole are dependent on a certain degree on CYP2C19 genotype status; however, the acid-inhibitory efficacy of rabeprazole is not influenced significantly by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism.

[1]  K. Yokota,et al.  Randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genotype , 2002, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[2]  M. Asaka,et al.  Efficacy of triple therapy with rabeprazole for Helicobacter pylori infection and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism , 2001, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[3]  T. Ishizaki,et al.  Comparison of the kinetic disposition of and serum gastrin change by lansoprazole versus rabeprazole during an 8-day dosing scheme in relation to CYP2C19 polymorphism , 2001, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[4]  K. Yokota,et al.  A randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole versus rabeprazole, in dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism , 2001, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[5]  T. Matsui,et al.  Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes , 2001, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[6]  阪井 俊介 CYP2C19 genotype and pharmacokinetics of three proton pump inhibitors in healthy subjects , 2001 .

[7]  S. Ishihara,et al.  CYP2C19 genotype status and intragastric pH during dosing with lansoprazole or rabeprazole , 2000, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  H. Zhou,et al.  Individual and ethnic differences in CYP2C19 activity in Chinese populations. , 2000, Acta pharmacologica Sinica.

[9]  T. Ishizaki,et al.  Review article: cytochrome P450 and the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors — emphasis on rabeprazole , 1999, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[10]  Williams,et al.  A placebo‐controlled trial to assess the effects of 8 days of dosing with rabeprazole versus omeprazole on 24‐h intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentrations in young healthy male subjects , 1998, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[11]  Hong-Guang Xie,et al.  Genetic analysis of the S‐mephenytoin polymorphism in a chinese population , 1995, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  K. Chiba,et al.  Comparison of the interaction potential of a new proton pump inhibitor, E3810, versus omeprazole with diazepam in extensive and poor metabolizers of S‐mephenytoin 4′‐hydroxylation , 1995, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  A. Ohnishi,et al.  Pharmacokinetic properties of E3810, a new proton pump inhibitor, in healthy male volunteers. , 1994, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[14]  G. Granneman,et al.  Age-related differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lansoprazole. , 1993, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[15]  T. Kamataki,et al.  Oxidative metabolism of omeprazole in human liver microsomes: cosegregation with S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation. , 1993, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[16]  L. Bertilsson,et al.  Slow omeprazole metabolizers are also poor S-mephenytoin hydroxylators. , 1990, Therapeutic drug monitoring.