Land Administration As-A-Service: Relevance, Applications, and Models

The ‘as-a-Service’ (aaS) concept of the IT sector is suggested to reduce upfront and ongoing costs, enable easier scaling, and make for simpler system upgrades. The concept is explored in relation to the domain of land administration, with a view to examining its relevance, application, and potential adaptation. Specifically, these aspects are analysed against the long-standing problem of land administration system maintenance. Two discrete literature reviews, a comparative analysis, and final modelling work constitute the research design. Of the 35 underlying land administration maintenance issues identified, aaS is found to directly respond to 15, indirectly support another 15, and provide no immediate benefit to 5. Most prominent are the ability of aaS to support issues relating to financial sustainability, continuous innovation, and human capacity provision. The approach is found to be already in use in various country contexts. It is articulated by the UNECE as one of four scenarios for future land administration development. In terms of adaptation, the 4-tier framework from Enterprise Architecture—consisting of Business, Application, Information, and Technology layers—is used to model and describe five specific aaS approaches: (i) On Premises; (ii) Basic Outsourcing; (iii) Public Private Partnership; (iv) Fully Privatised; and (v) Subscription. Several are more theoretical in nature but may see future adoption. Each requires further development, including case analyses, to support more detailed definitions of the required underlying legal frameworks, financial models, partnerships arrangements, data responsibilities, and so on. Decisions on the appropriate aaS model, and the application of aaS more generally, are entirely dependent on the specific country context. Overall, this work provides a platform for land administration researchers and practitioners to analyse the relevance and implementation options of the aaS concept.

[1]  Mohammad H. Vahidnia,et al.  VGI-based spatial data infrastructure for land administration , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[2]  F. Nex,et al.  Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[3]  R. Bennett,et al.  Exploring PPPs in Support of Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: A Case Study from Côte d’Ivoire , 2021, Land.

[4]  C. Lemmen,et al.  Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions , 2021 .

[5]  J. Crompvoets,et al.  Global policy transfer for land administration and disaster risk management , 2020 .

[6]  J. Zevenbergen,et al.  Towards Responsible Consolidation of Customary Lands: A Research Synthesis , 2019, Land.

[7]  Rob Christiaanse,et al.  Mobility as a Service , 2019, WWW.

[8]  Rohan Mark Bennett,et al.  Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[9]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Ganesh Prasad Bhatta,et al.  Advances in responsible land administration , 2016 .

[11]  W. Tsai,et al.  Software-as-a-service (SaaS): perspectives and challenges , 2014, Science China Information Sciences.

[12]  J. Kretschmann Stakeholder orientated sustainable land management: The Ruhr Area as a role model for urban areas , 2013 .

[13]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Land administration for food security: A research synthesis , 2013 .

[14]  T. Spies,et al.  Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Public Land Management , 2013, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[15]  Chandrakant D. Patel,et al.  Everything as a Service: Powering the New Information Economy , 2011, Computer.

[16]  Leena Jain,et al.  An Approach for Investigating Perspective of Cloud Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) , 2010 .

[17]  Jeffrey M. Voas,et al.  What's in a Name? Distinguishing between SaaS and SOA , 2008, IT Professional.

[18]  David C. Chou,et al.  Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: software-as-a-service business model , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Chang. Manag..

[19]  P. van der Molen,et al.  The dynamic aspect of land administration: an often-forgotten component in system design , 2002 .

[20]  David Griffiths,et al.  The future of software , 1999, CACM.

[21]  Lawrence Loh,et al.  Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  M D Shapiro,et al.  Software is a Product...Not , 1992 .

[23]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Evolving urban cadastres in Ethiopia: The impacts on urban land governance , 2015 .

[24]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Land tenure security: Revisiting and refining the concept for Sub-Saharan Africa's rural poor , 2014 .

[25]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  On recognizing land administration as critical, public good infrastructure , 2013 .

[26]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  On the need for national land administration infrastructures , 2012 .

[27]  Ian Williamson,et al.  Organising land information for sustainable land administration , 2008 .

[28]  Bret Waters,et al.  Software as a service: A look at the customer benefits , 2005 .

[29]  E. Fendel,et al.  The role of land administration in the accession of Central European countries to the European Union , 2002 .

[30]  Ryoichi Mori,et al.  The Concept of Software Service System (SSS) , 1988, Systems and Computers in Japan.

[31]  Edward N. Adams,et al.  Optimizing Preventive Service of Software Products , 1984, IBM J. Res. Dev..