Modeling variability in cortical representations of human complex sound perception

This study investigated methodological (task, stimulus) and intersubject variability in the cortical representation of auditory processing of complex sounds, including speech. Subjects were adult seizure patients undergoing left hemisphere electrocortical mapping (ECM). We tested auditory discrimination of complex sounds, including frequency-modulated tones and speech syllables (digitized, synthesized) contrasted by phonetic features and lexical status. To measure task effects, auditory comprehension was also tested. Within- and across-patient differences in the distribution of deficits induced by ECM were modeled statistically using the recently developed method of Template Mixture Modeling. Cortical representations of auditory discrimination were smaller, more localized, and less variable across subjects than auditory comprehension. Stimulus effects were observed only for speech-tone contrasts. When tasks and stimuli were held constant, two auditory discrimination centers were identified in the posterior temporal lobe. There was also an interaction between task and intersubject effects, with more intersubject variability in cortical maps of auditory comprehension than auditory discrimination. These results demonstrate the utility of using the statistical modeling approach of Template Mixture Modeling to quantify sources of variability in cortical functional organization.

[1]  R P Lesser,et al.  Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference , 1998, Neurology.

[2]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Auditory Selective Attention: An fMRI Investigation , 1996, NeuroImage.

[4]  Kevin P. Hinshaw,et al.  Functional Roles of Broca's Area and SMG: Evidence from Cortical Stimulation Mapping in a Deaf Signer , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  N. Thakor,et al.  Determination of current density distributions generated by electrical stimulation of the human cerebral cortex. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  S L Zeger,et al.  Template mixture models for direct cortical electrical interference data. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  W H Theodore,et al.  A direct comparison of PET activation and electrocortical stimulation mapping for language localization , 1997, Neurology.

[9]  G Hickok,et al.  Role of anterior temporal cortex in auditory sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Left‐hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients , 1997, Neuroreport.

[11]  G Ojemann,et al.  Human language cortex: localization of memory, syntax, and sequential motor-phoneme identification systems. , 1979, Science.

[12]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Lurito,et al.  Comparison of fMRI and intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in localization of receptive language areas. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Combining Images Across Multiple Subjects , 2002 .

[16]  R P Lesser,et al.  The location of speech and writing functions in the frontal language area. Results of extraoperative cortical stimulation. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[18]  A. Liberman,et al.  Parametrically Dissociating Speech and Nonspeech Perception in the Brain Using fMRI , 2001, Brain and Language.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Hearing and saying. The functional neuro-anatomy of auditory word processing. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[21]  F. Chollet,et al.  Differential fMRI Responses in the Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus and Left Supramarginal Gyrus to Habituation and Change Detection in Syllables and Tones , 1999, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  B. Gordon,et al.  Transcortical sensory aphasia: revisited and revised. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Detection of Sounds in the Auditory Stream: Event-Related fMRI Evidence for Differential Activation to Speech and Nonspeech , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Discrimination of voice versus place contrasts in aphasia , 1978, Brain and Language.

[26]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[27]  G. Ojemann Cortical organization of language , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[29]  E. Renzi,et al.  The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  D. Poeppel A Critical Review of PET Studies of Phonological Processing , 1996, Brain and Language.

[31]  S. Scott,et al.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  L. Vignolo,et al.  Phonemic Identification Defect in Aphasia , 1977, Cortex.

[33]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[34]  G. Ojemann Ojemann's data: Provocative but mysterious , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  H. Buckingham,et al.  Language Representation in the Human Brain: Evidence from Cortical Mapping , 2000, Brain and Language.

[36]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Neuroperceptual Differences in Consonant and Vowel Discrimination: As Revealed by Direct Cortical Electrical Interference , 1997, Cortex.