Deepening or lessening the divide between diphthongs : an analysis of the Queen's annual Christmas broadcasts

1. Introduction This study is about the changes that have taken place in the last fifty years to one variety of English, Received Pronunciation (RP), the so-called standard accent of Britain. It is also about defining some of the pronunciation characteristics of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Close to the time of writing, Professor John Laver CBE has accepted The Queen's Anniversary Prize, on behalf of Queen Margaret University College Edinburgh for its pioneering contributions to speech science. Just over two years before this, in a thoughtful and well-reasoned article on a paper we had just published entitled 'Does the Queen still speak the Queen's English', Philip Hensher writing in The Independent 1 noted that our study could hardly seem anything but disrespectful to the point of lèse-majesté, while The Times 2 , labelling us as 'three Australian phoneticists' (sic) in its Editorial of December 21 st 2000 entitled 'Our Common Queen: Rougher Talk from her Majesty' thundered: 'We are not amused — oh no we ain't.' We feel, then, that we have a duty to explain our motives for going down this potentially treacherous research path. Part of the answer is to be found in the multiple strands of speaker characteristics and variability that have been so carefully documented and modelled by John Laver in his many writings on 2 these subjects over the last thirty years. As discussed in both that define the characteristics of a speaker are due to considerably more than the anatomical and physiological properties of the vocal organs (although these of course play a considerable role as well). Within the same speaker there can be variations along a number of dimensions. The formality of speaking style can vary resulting in a greater or lesser tendency to reduce and assimilate speech. There can be variation in the paralinguistic tone of voice in which the loudness, pitch and segment duration can change according to a speaker's mood and emotional state. Articulatory settings can vary between speakers: there may be short-term differences, as in the tendency for some speakers of British English Received Pronunciation (RP) to produce /s/ with lip-rounding (Laver, 1994); or there may be long-term effects if, for example, a speaker habitually produces speech with hyponasality. Beyond these issues, there are the well-known differences in speakers due to dialect and social status, a factor that is especially relevant to the standard accent of England, Received …

[1]  A. Leitch THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. , 1901 .

[2]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .

[3]  D. Cannadine Class in Britain , 1998 .

[4]  G. Parsons From "RP" to "Estuary English": The concept 'received' and the debate about British pronunciation st , 1998 .

[5]  A. C. Gimson,et al.  An introduction to the pronunciation of English , 1991 .

[6]  J. Harrington,et al.  Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? , 2000, Nature.

[7]  J. Monkman,et al.  The Queen's English , 1990 .

[8]  D. Rosewarne Pronouncing Estuary English , 1994, English Today.

[9]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[10]  L. Bauer Tracing phonetic change in the received pronunciation of British English , 1985 .

[11]  Michael A. Gottfried,et al.  Three approaches to the classification of American English diphthongs , 1993 .

[12]  A. Ross,et al.  Noblesse Oblige; An Enquiry into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy. , 1956 .

[13]  Alexander John Ellis,et al.  Early English Pronunciation , 1972 .

[14]  Sunil Kumar Jha Acoustic analysis of the Maithili diphthongs , 1985 .

[15]  John S. Gunn Early Australian Pronunciation. , 1972 .

[16]  J. Harrington,et al.  Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts , 2000, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[17]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Cruttenden Gimson's Pronunciation of English , 1994 .

[19]  M. Yaeger-Dror Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Phonetic evidence for sound change in Quebec French , 1994 .

[20]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. Rosewarne,et al.  Estuary English: Hybrid or Hype? , 1999 .

[22]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system , 2001, Speech Commun..

[23]  K. D. Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[24]  Kate Burridge,et al.  English in Australia and New Zealand: An introduction to its history, structure, and use , 1998 .

[25]  J. Laver The phonetic description of voice quality , 1980 .

[26]  Royalese: the rise and fall of ‘The Queen's English’ , 1994, English Today.

[27]  David Deterding,et al.  The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation , 1997, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[28]  John Laver,et al.  Principles of Phonetics: Principles of transcription , 1994 .

[29]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Spectral analysis and identification of Dutch vowels in monosyllabic words , 1977 .

[30]  J. Harrington,et al.  An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels* , 1997 .

[31]  N. Geschwind Voice-Speech-Language , 1966 .

[32]  P. Trudgill,et al.  Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech , 1979 .

[33]  W. Labov Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[34]  Patricia A. Keating Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III , 1994 .

[35]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  T. Gay Effect of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[38]  M P Rastatter,et al.  Formant frequency characteristics of elderly speakers in contextual speech. , 1997, Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics.

[39]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands , 1961 .

[40]  Ludmila Urbanová,et al.  English Pronouncing Dictionary, 15th edition , 1997 .

[41]  P. Trudgill Language in the British Isles , 1984 .

[42]  J. Bernard,et al.  Toward the Acoustic Specification of Australian English , 1970 .

[43]  K. Scherer,et al.  Social Markers in Speech , 1980 .

[44]  CassidySteve,et al.  Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system , 2001 .

[45]  J. Wells,et al.  What is estuary English , 1997 .

[46]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification , 1986 .

[47]  Tamás Váradi,et al.  MARSEC: A Machine-Readable Spoken English Corpus , 1993, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[48]  T Gay,et al.  A Perceptual Study of American English Diphthongs , 1970, Language and speech.

[49]  J. Harrington,et al.  Techniques in Speech Acoustics , 1999, Computational Linguistics.