Testing Descriptive Utility Theories: Violations of Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Independence

[1]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Buying and Selling Prices of Investments: Configural Weight Model of Interactions Predicts Violations of Joint Independence. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  R. Luce.  Coalescing, Event Commutativity, and Theories of Utility , 1998 .

[3]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Configural weighting in judgments of two- and four-outcome gambles. , 1998 .

[4]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Testing Interval Independence Versus Configural Weighting Using Judgments of Strength of Preference , 1997 .

[5]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Violations of Branch Independence in Judgments of the Value of Gambles , 1997 .

[6]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function , 1996 .

[7]  R. Luce,et al.  When Four Distinct Ways to Measure Utility Are the Same , 1996 .

[8]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Violations of Branch Independence in Choices between Gambles , 1996 .

[9]  Steven J. Humphrey.  Regret aversion or event-splitting effects? more evidence under risk and uncertainty , 1995 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights , 1995 .

[11]  P. Fishburn,et al.  A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts , 1995 .

[12]  I. Erev,et al.  Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories , 1994 .

[13]  Jonathan W. Leland.  Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies , 1994 .

[14]  George Wu.  An empirical test of ordinal independence , 1994 .

[15]  R. Luce,et al.  What common ground exists for descriptive, prescriptive, and normative utility theories? , 1994 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory , 1993 .

[17]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects , 1993 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[19]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Violations of Monotonicity and Contextual Effects in Choice-Based Certainty Equivalents , 1992 .

[20]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Scale convergence and utility measurement , 1992 .

[21]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Utility Measurement: Configural-Weight Theory and the Judge's Point of View , 1992 .

[22]  A. Witte,et al.  The Influence of Probability on Risky Choice: A Parametric Examination , 1992 .

[23]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Violations of dominance in pricing judgments , 1992 .

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[26]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Where Does Subjective Expected Utility Fail Descriptively , 1989 .

[27]  W. Viscusi.  Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes , 1989 .

[28]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Rank-dependent, subjective expected-utility representations , 1988 .

[29]  J. Quiggin.  Subjective utility, anticipated utility, and the Allais paradox , 1985 .

[30]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[31]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model , 1978 .

[32]  M. Birnbaum.  The nonadditivity of personality impressions. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  A. K. Basu.  A Theory of Decision-Making , 1973, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[34]  M. Birnbaum.  Morality judgement: test of an averaging model with differential weights. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Belen Chavez,et al.  Notes on : Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision Under Risk ( Kahneman and Tversky 1979 ) Modigliani Group : , 2012 .

[36]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[37]  Barbara A. Mellers,et al.  Decision science and technology. Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards , 1999 .

[38]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  The Paradoxes of Allais, Stochastic Dominance, and Decision Weights , 1999 .

[39]  E. Weber,et al.  Reasons for Rank-Dependent Utility Evaluation , 1997 .

[40]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  The sure-thing principle and the comonotonic sure-thing principle: An axiomatic analysis☆ , 1996 .

[41]  P. Fishburn,et al.  Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles , 1991 .

[42]  Lola L. Lopes.  Re-Modeling Risk Aversion: A Comparison of Bernoullian and Rank Dependent Value Approaches , 1990 .

[43]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Judgment and decision-making theory. , 1990 .

[44]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Source Credibility in Social Judgment : Bias , Expertise , and the Judge ' s Point of View , 1979 .

[45]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge's Point of View , 1979 .