Options for and Effectiveness of Internet Self- and Co-Regulation Phase 3 (Final) Report

This is the final report of a study undertaken during 2007 into the 'Options for, and effectiveness of, Internet Self- and Co-Regulation'. The study was undertaken at the request of DG Information Society and Media as a contribution to improving the knowledge base for the Impact Assessment (IA) of any future proposed EC interventions (or considered non-interventions) in Self- and Co-Regulation, particularly in Internet-related areas.The study is based on the analysis of three types of evidence: case study evidence; theoretical and analytical evidence; and the evidence provided by public policy agendas. 21 detailed case studies of Internet self- and co-regulatory organisations (XROs) were undertaken during June-September 2007 using a common methodology broadly compatible with EC Guidelines for Evaluation. The case studies provided: descriptions and analysis of the varieties of XROs in terms of key characteristics; a description of their central processes (formation, membership, rule-making, monitoring, enforcement, sanction and self-evaluation); and correlation of these characteristics with policy areas, industry characteristics, geographic scope and extent, etc. The study also surveyed peer-reviewed literature within the Internet domain and beyond and strategy and implementation documents from a range of public-sector organisations, non-Internet XROs and stakeholder (industry and civil society) groups, as well as policy analytic papers.The case studies summarised in this report (Chapter 3) are documented in the Phase 2 report. Given their number and variety and the goal of informing future IA, the report does not aim at complete evaluation of Internet XROs per se or final judgments on their relative performance. Rather, the case studies complement the theoretical models and policy evidence to provide a fuller picture than previously existed of Internet self- and co-regulation within the context of public policy in order to address the complexity and dynamism of this extremely diverse topic.

[1]  A. Odlyzko.  The History of Communications and its Implications for the Internet , 2000 .

[2]  Bert Wijnen,et al.  Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) , 2005, RFC.

[3]  W. Meyer,et al.  Network Failures - How Realistic is Durable Cooperation in Global Governance? , 2004 .

[4]  Scott G. Dacko,et al.  Critically Examining Theory and Practice: Implications for Coregulation and Coregulating Broadcast Advertising in the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[5]  C. Stefanadis.  Self-Regulation, Innovation, and the Financial Industry , 2003 .

[6]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Private Actors on the Rise? The Role of Non-State Actors in Compliance with International Institutions , 2001 .

[7]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Governing as Governance , 2003 .

[8]  THE ASSESSMENT: THE ECONOMICS OF LEGAL REFORM , 1994 .

[9]  Erik Bohlin,et al.  Dynamic Regulation: Conceptual Foundations, Implementation, Effects , 2007 .

[10]  Richard Clayton,et al.  Failures in a Hybrid Content Blocking System , 2005, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[11]  MacCormackAlan,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs , 2006 .

[12]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[13]  P. Jost,et al.  Quacks, lemons, and self regulation: A welfare analysis , 1995 .

[14]  Y. Benkler.  Communications infrastructure regulation and the distribution of control over content , 1998 .

[15]  Robert N. M. Watson,et al.  Ignoring the Great Firewall of China , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[16]  Milton L. Mueller.  Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace , 2002 .

[17]  Jacopo Torriti.  Impact Assessment in the EU: A Tool for Better Regulation, Less Regulation or Less Bad Regulation? , 2007 .

[18]  Alfred C. Yen.  Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment , 2000 .

[19]  D. Clark,et al.  Complexity of Internet Interconnections: Technology, Incentives and Implications for Policy , 2007 .

[20]  B. Kahin,et al.  Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure , 1996 .

[21]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[22]  Jessica Coates.  Creative Commons : the next generation : CreativeCommons licence use five years on , 2007 .

[23]  P. Pattberg.  The institutionalization of private governance: How business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules , 2005 .

[24]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[25]  I. Bartle,et al.  SELF‐REGULATION WITHIN THE REGULATORY STATE: TOWARDS A NEW REGULATORY PARADIGM? , 2007 .

[26]  Colin A. J. Jacobs.  Improving the Quality of Regulatory Impact Assessments in the UK , 2005 .

[27]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  The Role of Private Decentralized Institutions in Sustaining Industry Self-Regulation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Paul Resnick,et al.  PICS: Internet access controls without censorship , 1996, CACM.

[29]  David Bach,et al.  Self‐Regulatory Trajectories in the Shadow of Public Power: Resolving Digital Dilemmas in Europe and the United States , 2004 .

[30]  Gilles Hilary,et al.  The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program , 2005 .

[31]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? , 2005, IMC '05.

[32]  A. Hira,et al.  Deregulation and Participation: An International Survey of Participation in Electricity Regulation , 2005 .

[33]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Switching the Default Rule , 2001 .

[34]  Maximillian Dornseif,et al.  Government mandated blocking of foreign Web content , 2004, DFN-Arbeitstagung über Kommunikationsnetze.

[35]  Javier Núñez.  Can self regulation work?: a story of corruption, impunity and cover-up , 2007 .

[36]  P. DeMarzo,et al.  Self-Regulation and Government Oversight , 2005 .

[37]  P. Humphreys,et al.  Globalization, the European Union, and Domestic Governance in Telecoms and Electricity , 2006 .

[38]  W. Kleinwächter.  Internet Co-Governance: Towards a Multilayer Multiplayer Mechanism of Consultation, Coordination and Cooperation (M3C3) , 2006 .

[39]  Karsten Ronit,et al.  Self-Regulation as Policy Process: The Multiple and Criss-Crossing Stages of Private Rule-Making , 2006 .

[40]  P. DeMarzo,et al.  The Enforcement Policy of a Self-Regulatory Organization , 2000 .

[41]  Tim Wu,et al.  Who Controls the Internet , 2006 .

[42]  D. Coen.  Business–Regulatory Relations: Learning to Play Regulatory Games in European Utility Markets , 2005 .

[43]  Jonathan L. Zittrain,et al.  Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling a Global Internet and Local Law , 2003 .

[44]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Industry Self‐Regulation: A Game‐Theoretic Typology of Strategic Voluntary Compliance , 2003 .

[45]  Jonathan Weinberg.  Rating the Net , 1996 .

[46]  T. Prosser.  Regulation and Social Solidarity , 2006 .

[47]  Mark A. Lemley.  Standardizing Government Standard-Setting Policy for Electronic Commerce , 1999 .

[48]  A. Michael Froomkin,et al.  Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using Icann to Route Around the APA and the Constitution , 2000 .

[49]  Tom Ling,et al.  Ex Ante Evaluation and the Changing Public Audit Function The Scenario Planning Approach , 2003 .

[50]  H. Ungerer.  Competition in the media sector – how long can the future be delayed? , 2005 .

[51]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[52]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information, ICTs and Ethical Trade: Implications for Self-Regulation , 2002 .

[53]  James M. Galvin.  IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees , 1996, RFC.

[54]  Jerome H. Saltzer,et al.  End-to-end arguments in system design , 1984, TOCS.

[55]  J. Reidenberg.  Technology and Internet Jurisdiction , 2005 .

[56]  D. Levi‐Faur.  Varieties of Regulatory Capitalism: Getting the Most Out of the Comparative Method , 2006 .

[57]  Mathias Klang,et al.  Human Rights in the Digital Age , 2004 .

[58]  Andreas Freytag,et al.  The Economics of Self-regulation in telecommunications under sunset legislation , 2004 .

[59]  Andrea H. Tapia,et al.  Government-Mandated Open Source Development: The Case Study of Venezuela , 2007 .

[60]  David Clark,et al.  The End-to-End Argument and Application Design: The Role of Trust , 2007 .

[61]  Jonathan L. Zittrain,et al.  A History of Online Gatekeeping , 2006 .

[62]  Regulatory Threat in Vertically Related Markets: The Case of German Electricity , 2004 .

[63]  O. Borraz,et al.  Governing Standards: The Rise of Standardization Processes in France and in the EU , 2007 .

[64]  C. Marsden.  Regulating the Global Information Society , 2000 .

[65]  D. Levi‐Faur.  Varieties of Regulatory Capitalism: Sectors and Nations in the Making of a New Global Order , 2006 .

[66]  Ian Brown,et al.  Internet censorship: be careful what you ask for , 2007 .

[67]  B. Kahin,et al.  Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure , 1995 .

[68]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Bell Doctrine: Applications in Telecommunications, Electricity, and Other Network Industries , 1999 .

[69]  Matthias Finger,et al.  Governance of network industries: towards European regulators, differentiated regulation or self-regulation? , 2006 .

[70]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Overcoming Agoraphobia: Building the Commons of the Digitally Networked Environment , 2002 .

[71]  Tim Wu,et al.  The World Trade Law of Internet Filtering , 2006 .

[72]  Jonathan Zittrain,et al.  Law and technologyThe end of the generative internet , 2009, CACM.

[73]  Nick Feamster,et al.  Infranet: Circumventing Web Censorship and Surveillance , 2002, USENIX Security Symposium.

[74]  Egbert Dommering.  Regulating Technology: Code is Not Law , 2006 .

[75]  David W. Opderbeck.  Socially Rivalrous Information: Of Candles, Code, and Virtue , 2007 .

[76]  S. Polasky,et al.  Cooperation in the commons , 2006 .

[77]  Gavin Sutter,et al.  'Nothing new under the sun': old fears and new media , 2000, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[78]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Taxation by Regulation , 1971 .

[79]  D. Kerwer,et al.  Rules that Many Use: Standards and Global Regulation , 2005 .

[80]  Scott O. Bradner,et al.  The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process , 1996, RFC.

[81]  Wolter Lemstra,et al.  The Economics of Malware , 2007 .

[82]  Mark A. Lemley.  Rationalizing Internet Safe Harbors , 2007, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[83]  Jos Dumortier,et al.  The Co-Protection of Minors in New Media: A European Approach to Co-Regulation , 2005 .

[84]  P. DeMarzo,et al.  Contracting and Enforcement with a Self-Regulatory Organization , 2001 .

[85]  Ian H Maitland.  The Limits of Business Self-Regulation , 1985 .

[86]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  Self-regulation, Taxation, and Public Voluntary Environmental Agreements , 2003 .

[87]  Rob Frieden.  Neither Fish Nor Fowl: New Strategies for Selective Regulation of Information Services , 2008, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[88]  B. Briscoe,et al.  Metcalfe's law is wrong - communications networks increase in value as they add members-but by how much? , 2006, IEEE Spectrum.

[89]  R. Posner.  Theories of Economic Regulation , 1974 .

[90]  Scott O. Bradner,et al.  Collaboration between ISOC/IETF and ITU-T , 1998, RFC.

[91]  Malte Ziewitz,et al.  Jefferson Rebuffed - the United States and the Future of Internet Governance , 2006 .

[92]  Ian Brown.  Standards bodies' approaches to wiretapping requirements , 2002 .

[93]  Inge Kaul,et al.  Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century , 1999 .

[94]  Stephen Wilks,et al.  Agency Escape: Decentralization or Dominance of the European Commission in the Modernization of Competition Policy? , 2005 .

[95]  Linda A.J. Senden,et al.  Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet? , 2006 .