Critical Factors of Digital Supply Chains for Organizational Performance Improvement

Technological advancement is redefining supply chains (SCs) processes and soon traditional ways of managing SCs will no more be feasible and effective. Due to recent advancement in technology, digitalization has become an emerging topic among decision-makers and researchers. To cope-up with this emerging trend in customer behavior and remain competitive, organizations must move from their traditional ways of managing their SCs to digital supply chains (DSCs) for improved organizational performance. Therefore, the purpose of this article is in two folds: First, to identify critical factors of DSCs that are essential for transitioning traditional SCs to DSCs to improve organizational performance. Second, interpretive structural modeling is used to establish the relationship among critical factors and (matriced’ impacts croise´s multiplication applique´e a´un classement used to identify the driving and dependency power of the critical factors. Thus, this article identified fifteen DSC critical factors and established their direct and indirect effect on DSCs. The results show that “SC resilience”, and “proactive prevention” have the highest dependency power factors whilst “integration” and “advanced operational models” have the highest driving power factors. This article can help SC managers and decision-makers to understand the critical factors essential in adopting DSCs for improving organizational performance.

[1]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Enablers to supply chain performance on the basis of digitization technologies , 2020, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[2]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A Novel Approach Integrating AHP and COPRAS Under Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets for Digital Supply Chain Partner Selection , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  S. Khan,et al.  Social sustainable supply chains in the food industry: A perspective of an emerging economy , 2020 .

[4]  Tero Rantala,et al.  Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies , 2020 .

[5]  Saliha Karadayi-Usta,et al.  An Interpretive Structural Analysis for Industry 4.0 Adoption Challenges , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Improving Interorganizational Information Sharing for Vendor Managed Inventory: Toward a Decentralized Information Hub Using Blockchain Technology , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  Lincoln C. Wood,et al.  Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance , 2020 .

[8]  Carsten Maple,et al.  Electronic Regulation of Data Sharing and Processing Using Smart Ledger Technologies for Supply-Chain Security , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Amin Chaabane,et al.  Supply chain performance measurement systems: a qualitative review and proposed conceptual framework , 2020, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering.

[10]  G. Graham,et al.  Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future , 2019, Production Planning & Control.

[11]  Assunta Di Vaio,et al.  Digitalization in the sea-land supply chain: experiences from Italy in rethinking the port operations within inter-organizational relationships , 2020 .

[12]  Nishant Agrawal,et al.  A framework for Crosby’s quality principles using ISM and MICMAC approaches , 2019 .

[13]  Inayat Ullah,et al.  Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach , 2019, Journal of Modelling in Management.

[14]  William J. Sawaya,et al.  Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes , 2019, Business Horizons.

[15]  A. Chaabane,et al.  A knowledge-based system for overall supply chain performance evaluation: a multi-criteria decision making approach , 2019, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[16]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  Identifying critical success factors to facilitate reusable plastic packaging towards sustainable supply chain management. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Jiangnan Qiu,et al.  Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis for Identifying and Benchmarking Significant Factors of Seismic Soil Liquefaction , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[18]  Mrinmoy Chakraborty,et al.  Technology Integration for Improved Performance: A Case Study in Digitization of Supply Chain with Integration of Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology , 2019, 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC).

[19]  J. Sarkis,et al.  A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[20]  Christian Daxböck,et al.  Digitized Performance Management Along the Supply Chain , 2019, Performance Management in Retail and the Consumer Goods Industry.

[21]  Yong Qin,et al.  Assessing contributory factors in potential systemic accidents using AcciMap and integrated fuzzy ISM - MICMAC approach , 2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[22]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[23]  E. Devadason,et al.  Measuring Human Capital in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: What Matters? , 2018 .

[24]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[25]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach to Supply Chain Resilience Assessment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[26]  Feng Li The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends , 2018, Technovation.

[27]  Jyoti Dhingra Darbari,et al.  Analysis of Impediments to Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach , 2018 .

[28]  Amir Hossein Gharehgozli,et al.  Trends in global E-food supply chain and implications for transport: literature review and research directions , 2017 .

[29]  K. Voigt,et al.  The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies – A business level perspective , 2017 .

[30]  Chunguang Bai,et al.  An implementation path for green information technology systems in the Ghanaian mining industry , 2017 .

[31]  Florian Kerschbaum,et al.  Selective access for supply chain management in the cloud , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS).

[32]  Vasdev Malhotra,et al.  Modelling and analysis of agile manufacturing system by ISM and MICMAC analysis , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[33]  Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes,et al.  Barriers in Green Lean implementation: a combined systematic literature review and interpretive structural modelling approach , 2017 .

[34]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Digital Supply Chain Transformation toward Blockchain Integration , 2017, HICSS.

[35]  Knut Alicke,et al.  Supply Chain 4 . 0 in consumer goods , 2017 .

[36]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  The digitization of a food package's life cycle: Existing and emerging computer systems in the logistics and post-logistics phase , 2017, Comput. Ind..

[37]  Santosh B. Rane,et al.  Interpretive structural modelling of risk sources in medical device development process , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[38]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation , 2016 .

[39]  Vijay Nehra,et al.  Identification and analysis of barriers in implementation of solar energy in Indian rural sector using integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach , 2016 .

[40]  Mahmoud Maqableh,et al.  The Impact of Electronic Supply Chain Management Usage on Firm’s Performance , 2016 .

[41]  R. Anbanandam,et al.  Healthcare waste management: an interpretive structural modeling approach. , 2016, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[42]  Vinay Sharma,et al.  Impediments to Social Sustainability Adoption in the Supply Chain: An ISM and MICMAC Analysis in Indian Manufacturing Industries , 2016 .

[43]  Vishal Ashok Bhosale,et al.  An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modelling the supply chain knowledge flow enablers , 2016 .

[44]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Barriers in green lean six sigma product development process: an ISM approach , 2016 .

[45]  J. Wolfert,et al.  Virtualization of food supply chains with the internet of things , 2016 .

[46]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  A multi-criteria decision support model for evaluating the performance of partnerships , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  M. Rappa Managing the Digital Enterprise , 2016 .

[48]  A. Haleem,et al.  An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective , 2015 .

[49]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Green supply chain management enablers: Mixed methods research , 2015 .

[50]  Vinay Sharma,et al.  Enablers for Competitiveness of Indian Manufacturing Sector: An ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC Analysis , 2015 .

[51]  V. R. Pramod,et al.  Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) , 2015 .

[52]  Tripti Singh,et al.  Understanding complex relationship among JIT, lean behaviour, TQM and their antecedents using interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis , 2015 .

[53]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers , 2014 .

[54]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Identification of Flexible Manufacturing System Dimensions and Their Interrelationship Using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and Fuzzy MICMAC Analysis , 2014 .

[55]  Sachin Kumar Mangla,et al.  Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing Performance of Sustainable Supply Chains Under Risks/Uncertainty , 2014 .

[56]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Benchmarking the interactions among barriers in third-party logistics implementation: An ISM approach , 2013 .

[57]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system , 2013 .

[58]  B. Bhargava,et al.  Secure information sharing in digital supply chains , 2013, 2013 3rd IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC).

[59]  Nikhil Dev,et al.  Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview , 2013 .

[60]  Z. Rahman,et al.  Modelling relationship marketing strategies for sustainability adoption , 2013 .

[61]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[62]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[63]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management , 2011 .

[64]  Tilak Raj,et al.  Quantifying barriers to implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) , 2010 .

[65]  P. K. Mishra,et al.  MODELING OF INFORMATION SHARING ENABLERS FOR BUILDING TRUST IN INDIAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: AN INTEGRATED ISM AND FUZZY MICMAC APPROACH , 2010 .

[66]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  Information technology and supply chain collaboration: moderating effects of existing relationships between partners , 2005, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[67]  Tony Hines,et al.  Supply Chain Strategies , 2004 .

[68]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[69]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[70]  Prem Vrat,et al.  Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation , 1990 .

[71]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[72]  Michel Godet,et al.  Méthode de hiérarchisation des éléments d'un système : essai de prospective du système de l'énergie nucléaire dans son contexte sociétal , 1973 .