Measuring the Congruence Between Market Requirements and Manufacturing: A Methodology and Illustration*

This paper presents a measurement methodology, based on existing research in the manufacturing strategy and general strategy areas, for evaluating the congruence between market needs and manufacturing plant capabilities. The proposed methodology has several important advantages over current approaches. First, the methodology uses available data and statistical techniques to measure market-manufacturing congruence. As a result, it is not dependent on assumptions about “classic” process choices. Second, the proposed methodology can evaluate the strategic fit between market needs and manufacturing in light of one or more performance criteria. Third, the methodology can be used to derive scalar measures of market-manufacturing congruence, allowing users to evaluate congruence for a large number of products, customers, or market segments. The theoretical basis, research objectives and major steps of the methodology are discussed, followed by an illustrative example from a North American manufacturer. Finally, the applicability of the methodology to a wide range of strategic manufacturing decisions is discussed.

[1]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[2]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure , 1996 .

[3]  Michael J. Pesch,et al.  Focusing the factory: Eight lessons , 1994 .

[4]  S. Vickery,et al.  Production Competence and Business Strategy: Do They Affect Business Performance? , 1993 .

[5]  P. R. Richardson,et al.  A Strategic Approach to Evaluating Manufacturing Performance , 1985 .

[6]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[7]  Anil Menon,et al.  A Model of Marketing Knowledge use within Firms , 1992 .

[8]  K. Platts,et al.  Manufacturing Audit in the Process of Strategy Formulation , 1990 .

[9]  Terence J. Hill,et al.  Progression or regression in facilities focus , 1983 .

[10]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[11]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis , 1982 .

[12]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Manufacturing Focus , 1993 .

[13]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  A Comparison of Factors Affecting Researcher and Manager Perceptions of Market Research Use , 1984 .

[14]  George S. Fishman,et al.  Bias Considerations in Simulation Experiments , 1972, Oper. Res..

[15]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  Factory focus: Segmenting markets from an operations perspective , 1991 .

[16]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[17]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[18]  R. B. Whitner,et al.  Guidelines for selecting and using simulation model verification techniques , 1989, WSC '89.

[19]  G. Zaltman,et al.  A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Consumer and Industrial Firms , 1987 .

[20]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A Theory of Production Competence , 1989 .

[21]  Lee W. Schruben,et al.  Detecting Initialization Bias in Simulation Output , 1982, Oper. Res..

[22]  Noel P. Greis,et al.  The diminishing utility of the product/process matrix , 1997 .

[23]  Noel Capon,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: MORE EVIDENCE* , 1994 .

[24]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .