EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL RATES IN METAPOPULATION MODELS: BRANCHING AND CYCLIC DYNAMICS IN PHENOTYPE SPACE

We study the evolution of dispersal rates in a two patch metapopulation model. The local dynamics in each patch are given by difference equations, which, together with the rate of dispersal between the patches, determine the ecological dynamics of the metapopulation. We assume that phenotypes are given by their dispersal rate. The evolutionary dynamics in phenotype space are determined by invasion exponents, which describe whether a mutant can invade a given resident population. If the resident metapopulation is at a stable equilibrium, then selection on dispersal rates is neutral if the population sizes in the two patches are the same, while selection drives dispersal rates to zero if the local abundances are different. With non‐equilibrium metapopulation dynamics, non‐zero dispersal rates can be maintained by selection. In this case, and if the patches are ecologically identical, dispersal rates always evolve to values which induce synchronized metapopulation dynamics. If the patches are ecologically different, evolutionary branching into two coexisting dispersal phenotypes can be observed. Such branching can happen repeatedly, leading to polymorphisms with more than two phenotypes. If there is a cost to dispersal, evolutionary cycling in phenotype space can occur due to the dependence of selection pressures on the ecological attractor of the resident population, or because phenotypic branching alternates with the extinction of one of the branches. Our results extend those of Holt and McPeek (1996), and suggest that phenotypic branching is an important evolutionary process. This process may be relevant for sympatric speciation.

[1]  T. Kawecki.  Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. Doebeli.  A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation , 1996 .

[3]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[4]  M. Gyllenberg,et al.  Does migration stabilize local population dynamics? Analysis of a discrete metapopulation model. , 1993, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  Ross Cressman,et al.  The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory , 1992 .

[6]  A. Lloyd.  THE COUPLED LOGISTIC MAP : A SIMPLE MODEL FOR THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY ON POPULATION DYNAMICS , 1995 .

[7]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Chaotic Population Dynamics Favors the Evolution of Dispersal , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[9]  J. Feder.  The Effects of Parasitoids on Sympatric Host Races of Rhagoletis Pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) , 1995 .

[10]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  The Stability of Predator‐Prey Systems , 1973 .

[12]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  INDETERMINATE OUTCOME OF CERTAIN EXPERIMENTS ON DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS , 1953 .

[13]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations , 1993 .

[14]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENCE IN SINGLE-SPECIES POPULATIONS , 1975 .

[15]  R. May,et al.  Bifurcations and Dynamic Complexity in Simple Ecological Models , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. May,et al.  Metapopulations and equilibrium stability: the effects of spatial structure. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Holt.  Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[18]  I. Scheuring,et al.  On the evolution of density dependent dispersal in a spatially structured population model. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[20]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  D. Schluter.  Experimental Evidence That Competition Promotes Divergence in Adaptive Radiation , 1994, Science.

[22]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal , 1983 .

[23]  T. Bellows.  The Descriptive Properties of Some Models for Density Dependence , 1981 .

[24]  Invasion of rare mutants does not imply their evolutionary success: a counterexample from metapopulation theory , 1998 .

[25]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  DISPERSAL AND DYNAMICS , 1995 .

[26]  W. Ricker.  Stock and Recruitment , 1954 .

[27]  D. Tautz,et al.  Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids , 1994, Nature.