Grasping the invisible: Semantic processing of abstract words

[1]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Cognitive Dynamics : Conceptual and Representational Change in Humans and Machines , 2014 .

[2]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal , 2013, Cognition.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  On the Early Influence of Meaning in Word Recognition: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[4]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  The semantic richness of abstract concepts , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Effects of Emotional and Sensorimotor Knowledge in Semantic Processing of Concrete and Abstract Nouns , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  J. Adelman.  Visual word recognition, volume 2 : meaning and context, individuals and development , 2012 .

[7]  Ludmila D. Nunes,et al.  The contributions of language and experience to the representation of abstract and concrete words: Different weights but similar organizations , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Oxytocin Receptor Genetic Variation Promotes Human Trust Behavior Materials and Methods , 2012 .

[9]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  J. Adelman.  Meaning and context, individuals and development , 2012 .

[12]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Guy Dove.  On the need for Embodied and Dis-Embodied Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[15]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond , 2011 .

[16]  M. Louwerse,et al.  The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing , 2010, Cognition.

[17]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[19]  Stavroula Kousta,et al.  Toward a theory of semantic representation , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[20]  Dennis J. Delprato,et al.  Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach , 2009 .

[21]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm , 2009, Cognition.

[22]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[23]  K. McRae,et al.  Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[24]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  NoA’s ark: Influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition , 2008 .

[26]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general , 2008 .

[28]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[29]  Xiaoping P. Hu,et al.  fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[30]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.

[32]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language and simulation in conceptual processing , 2008 .

[33]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[34]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  The Neural Consequences of Semantic Richness , 2007, Psychological science.

[36]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  E. Warrington,et al.  The Different Frameworks Underlying Abstract and Concrete Knowledge: Evidence from a Bilingual Patient with a Semantic Refractory Access Dysphasia , 2006, Neurocase.

[38]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[39]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[40]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Situating Abstract Concepts , 2004 .

[42]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[44]  L. Colombo,et al.  The Influence of Age of Acquisition, Root Frequency, and Context Availability in Processing Nouns and Verbs , 2002, Brain and Language.

[45]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Normsfor English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech Report C-1) , 1999 .

[49]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[50]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The Dynamics of Meaning in Memory , 1998 .

[51]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[52]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[53]  R. W. Stowe,et al.  Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words , 1988 .

[54]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[55]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[56]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams , 1977 .

[57]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[58]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.