Influence of machining parameters on part geometrical error in abrasive waterjet offset-mode turning

Geometrical error in abrasive waterjet turned parts is an important challenge toward the commercialization of abrasive waterjet turning process. A systematic study has not been done yet to investigate the effects of process parameters on geometrical error in abrasive waterjet offset-mode turning. In this article, a comprehensive study has been performed to investigate the influence of several machining parameters on the geometrical error (part diameter percent error) in turning AA2011-T4 aluminum alloy round bars. Water pressure, cutting head traverse speed, workpiece rotational speed, abrasive mass flow rate and depth of cut were considered as the main machining parameters in a five-level statistical experimental design. Based on central composite rotatable design, a total of 52 experiments were carried out. The main effects of the parameters and interactions among them were analyzed based on the analysis of variance technique, and the response contours for the part geometrical error were obtained using a quadratic regression model (i.e. response surface methodology). The model predictions were found to be in good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, among the significant parameters, water pressure, depth of cut and traverse speed are the most influential parameters, with percent contribution of almost 25% each. Abrasive mass flow rate is the least influential parameter with a percent contribution of 4%.

[1]  Zhaowei Zhong,et al.  Turning of glass with abrasive waterjet , 2002 .

[2]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Response-Surface Methods in R, Using rsm , 2009 .

[3]  M. Hashish,et al.  Effect of Abrasive Waterjet Parameters on Volume Removal Trends in Turning , 1995 .

[4]  James M. Lucas,et al.  Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analysis, Second Edition , 2007 .

[5]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[6]  Dragos Axinte,et al.  Abrasive waterjet turning—An efficient method to profile and dress grinding wheels , 2009 .

[7]  Marian Mazurkiewicz,et al.  A manufacturing tool for a new century , 2000 .

[8]  M. M. Ohadi,et al.  Flow visualization study of the macromechanics of abrasive-waterjet turning , 1992 .

[9]  N. Ramesh Babu,et al.  An erosion-based model for abrasive waterjet turning of ductile materials , 2009 .

[10]  N. Ramesh Babu,et al.  Influence of jet impact angle on part geometry in abrasive waterjet turning of aluminium alloys , 2008 .

[11]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  State of the Art of Research and Development in Abrasive Waterjet Machining , 1997 .

[12]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[13]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[14]  M. Zohoor,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Abrasive Waterjet Turning of Ductile Materials , 2010 .

[15]  M. Hashish,et al.  Turning With Abrasive-Waterjets—A First Investigation , 1987 .

[16]  E. Uhlmann,et al.  Abrasive Waterjet Turning of High Performance Materials , 2012 .

[17]  M. Zohoor,et al.  Modeling of Abrasive Waterjet Turning , 2011 .

[18]  Jun Wang,et al.  An Experimental Study of Radial-Mode Abrasive Waterjet Turning of Steels , 2011 .

[19]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery , 2006 .