Use of an angular transformation for ratio estimation in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Economic evaluations of medical technologies involve a consideration of both costs and clinical benefits, and an increasing number of clinical studies include a specific objective of assessing cost-effectiveness. These studies measure the trade-off between costs and benefits using the cost-effectiveness ratio (CE ratio), which is defined as the net incremental cost per unit of benefit provided by the candidate therapy. In this paper we review the statistical methods which have been proposed for estimating 95 per cent confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios. We show that the use of an angular transformation of the standardized ratio stabilizes the variance of the estimated CE ratio, and provides a clearer interpretation of study results. An estimate of the 95 per cent confidence interval for the CE ratio in the transformed scale is easily made using the jack-knife or bootstrap. The available methods are compared using data from a long term study of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

[1]  Bernie J. O'Brien,et al.  In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health Care , 1994, Medical care.

[2]  M Meisner,et al.  Statistical inference for cost-effectiveness ratios. , 1997, Health economics.

[3]  A R Willan,et al.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem. , 1996, Health economics.

[4]  P. Wakker,et al.  Confidence intervals for cost/effectiveness ratios. , 1995, Health economics.

[5]  D Polsky,et al.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. , 1997, Health economics.

[6]  Rupert G. Miller.  The jackknife-a review , 1974 .

[7]  A S Detsky,et al.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[8]  B. Kinosian,et al.  Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: an economic analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial. , 1995, Journal of cardiac failure.

[9]  M. Tambour,et al.  Bootstrap confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: some simulation results. , 1998, Health economics.

[10]  A A Stinnett.  Adjusting for bias in C/E ratio estimates. , 1996, Health economics.

[11]  S. Stearns,et al.  Estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an example from a randomized trial. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  E. C. Fieller.  SOME PROBLEMS IN INTERVAL ESTIMATION , 1954 .

[13]  W C Black,et al.  The CE Plane , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  M F Drummond,et al.  Economic Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: Revisiting the Methodological Issues , 1991, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[15]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .