Selective learning in the acquisition of Kannada ditransitives

In this article we offer up a particular linguistic phenomenon, quantifier-variable binding in Kannada ditransitives, as a proving ground upon which competing claims about learnability can be evaluated with respect to the relative abstractness of children’s grammatical knowledge. We first identify one aspect of syntactic representation that exhibits a range of syntactic, morphological, and semantic consequences both within and across languages, namely the hierarchical structure of ditransitive verb phrases (Barss & Lasnik 1986, Larson 1988, Harley 2002). Next we show that while the semantic consequences of this structure are parallel in English, Kannada, and Spanish, the word order and morphological reflexes of this structure diverge. Thus, although it is clear that the same structures are exhibited crosslinguistically, the evidence available to learners that would allow them to identify these structures is variable. We then turn to an examination of children learning Kannada, demonstrating that they have command of the relation between morphological form and semantic interpretation in ditransitives with respect to quantifier-variable binding. Finally, we offer a proposal on how a selective learning mechanism might succeed in identifying the appropriate structures in this domain despite the variability in surface expression.

[1]  David M. Perlmutter,et al.  Language-Internal Explanation: The Distribution of Russian Impersonals , 2003 .

[2]  K. Salzinger Skinner's Verbal Behavior , 2008 .

[3]  Anne E. Fowler,et al.  Developmental shifts in the construction of verb meanings , 1992 .

[4]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[5]  David Lightfoot,et al.  The development of language , 1999 .

[6]  L. Haegeman Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[7]  Pascual José Masullo Incorporation and case theory in Spanish : a crosslinguistic perspective , 1992 .

[8]  H. Harley Subjects, events, and licensing , 1995 .

[9]  R. Brown A First Language , 1973 .

[10]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The syntactic domain of anaphora , 1976 .

[11]  S. Pinker Formal models of language learning , 1979, Cognition.

[12]  Perla B. Gámez,et al.  Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[14]  E. Anagnostopoulou The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics , 2003 .

[15]  Paul M. Pietroski,et al.  Events and Semantic Architecture , 2005 .

[16]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[17]  R. Larson Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff , 1990 .

[18]  Norbert Hornstein A Theory of Syntax: Deriving c-command , 2008 .

[19]  Cynthia L Fisher Structural Limits on Verb Mapping. , 1993 .

[20]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[21]  E. Conwell,et al.  Early syntactic productivity: Evidence from dative shift , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  Zelda,et al.  Coreference and Bound Anaphora: a Restatement of the Anaphora Questions* , 2004 .

[23]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[24]  Tonia Bleam,et al.  Properties of the double object construction in Spanish , 2003 .

[25]  M. Tomasello First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[26]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  C-locality and the Interaction of Reflexives and Ditransitives , 2004 .

[27]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[28]  김두식,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations , 2006 .

[29]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[31]  Margarita Suñer,et al.  The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions , 1988 .

[32]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Clausal backgrounding and pronominal reference: A functionalist approach to c-command , 2002 .

[33]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure , 1997 .

[34]  Stefano Bertolo Language Acquisition and Learnability. , 2001 .

[35]  Tonia Bleam,et al.  Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling , 1999 .

[36]  M. R. Manzini Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[37]  R. Clark The Selection of Syntactic Knowledge , 1992 .

[38]  Susan Donna Fischer The acquisition of verb-particle and dative constructions , 1972 .

[39]  Alejna Brugos,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2004 .

[40]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The Abstract Nature of Syntactic Representations: Consequences for a Theory of Learning , 2008 .

[41]  Michael Don Palmer,et al.  Reflections on language , 1977 .

[42]  Heidi Harley,et al.  Possession and the double object construction , 2002 .

[43]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .

[44]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  What paradox? A response to Naigles , 2003 .

[45]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[46]  A. Barss,et al.  A note on anaphora and double objects , 1986 .

[47]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[48]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[49]  J. Musolino,et al.  Children's command of quantification , 2002, Cognition.

[50]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[51]  Georgia M. Green,et al.  Semantics and Syntactic Regularity , 1974 .

[52]  Miriam Butt,et al.  An architecture for linking theory in LFG , 2009 .

[53]  Javier Ormazabal Zamakona,et al.  On the syntactic nature of the me-lui and the person-case constraint , 1998 .

[54]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior , 1980 .

[55]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese , 2004 .

[56]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Coreference in Child Russian : Distinguishing Syntactic and Discourse Constraints , 2001 .

[57]  Karen Van Hoek,et al.  Anaphora and Conceptual Structure , 1997 .

[58]  Noam Chomsky Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[59]  M. Tomasello,et al.  How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions. , 1999 .

[60]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[61]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[62]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[63]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .

[64]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Valency in Kannada: Evidence for Interpretive Morphology , 1998 .

[65]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[66]  Nina Kazanina,et al.  The Acquisition and Processing of Backwards Anaphora , 2005 .

[67]  Devin M. Casenhiser,et al.  The role of prediction in construction-learning , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[68]  D. Lightfoot The development of language , 1999 .

[69]  Violeta Demonte,et al.  Dative alternation in Spanish , 1995 .

[70]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Why children aren't universally successful with quantification , 2006 .

[71]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[72]  Joshua Viau Possession and Spatial Motion in the Acquisition of Ditransitives , 2008 .

[73]  I. Noveck When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[74]  MICHAEL TOMASELLO,et al.  Young children's earliest transitive and intransitive constructions , 1998 .

[75]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  One child's early talk about possession , 1998 .

[76]  McMahon Jeffrey,et al.  Quantifier Raising in 4-year-olds , 2004 .

[77]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Polysynthesis Parameter , 1995 .

[78]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming in 4-Year-Olds , 2006 .

[79]  K. V. Tirumalesh The landscape of language : issues in Kannada linguistics , 2000 .

[80]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000) , 2002, Cognition.

[81]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades , 1994 .

[82]  Margarita Suñer,et al.  Resumptive restrictive relatives: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1998 .

[83]  Noam Chomsky Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[84]  Joan L. Bybee The Emergent Lexicon , 2007 .

[85]  Anoop Mahajan,et al.  The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory , 1990 .

[86]  A. L. Campbell,et al.  The acquisition of English dative constructions , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[87]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[88]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of abstract structure in 2.5‐year‐olds’ interpretations of novel verbs , 2002 .

[89]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar , 2003, Cognition.

[90]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization , 2005 .

[91]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life , 2006, Cognition.

[92]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 , 2008, Journal of Linguistics.

[93]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Parsing to Learn , 1998 .

[94]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Double Objects Again , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[95]  Dorothy Irene Marquart,et al.  The Language Lottery: Toward a Biology of Grammars , 1982 .

[96]  B. Dresher,et al.  A computational learning model for metrical phonology , 1990, Cognition.

[97]  Maria Cristina Cuervo,et al.  Datives at large , 2003 .

[98]  David Bamman,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2006 .

[99]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Language Acquisition and Learnability: The Structural Triggers Learner , 2001 .

[100]  Mary P. Harper,et al.  Self-Training PCFG Grammars with Latent Annotations Across Languages , 2009, EMNLP.

[101]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .

[102]  María Luisa Rivero,et al.  An applicative analysis of double object constructions in Romanian , 2007 .

[103]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[104]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[105]  David Lightfoot,et al.  How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change , 1991 .

[106]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[107]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[108]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora , 1981 .

[109]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[110]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[111]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  What paradox? A response to Naigles (2002) , 2003, Cognition.

[112]  Yukio Oba,et al.  ON THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION , 1993 .

[113]  William Snyder,et al.  Child Language: The Parametric Approach , 2007 .

[114]  Marilyn Shatz,et al.  Blackwell handbook of language development , 2006 .

[115]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[116]  I. Krämer,et al.  Cognitive foundations of interpretation , 2007 .

[117]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types , 2005 .

[118]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[119]  Sandhya Sundaresan,et al.  The Argument Structure of Verbal Alternations in Tamil , 2006 .

[120]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[121]  R. Horton Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[122]  Joseph E. Aoun,et al.  Scope and constituency , 1989 .

[123]  S. Crain Language acquisition in the absence of experience , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[124]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[125]  David Lightfoot How to set parameters , 1991 .

[126]  J. Newman The linguistics of giving , 1998 .