A microPET/CT system for in vivo small animal imaging

A microCT scanner was designed, fabricated and integrated with a previously reported microPET II scanner (Tai et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1519, Yang et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2527), forming a dual modality system for in vivo anatomic and molecular imaging of the mouse. The system was designed to achieve high-spatial-resolution and high-sensitivity PET images with adequate CT image quality for anatomic localization and attenuation correction with low x-ray dose. The system also has relatively high throughput for screening, and a flexible gantry and user interface. X-rays were produced by a 50 kVp, 1.5 mA fixed tungsten anode tube, with a focal spot size of 70 microm. The detector was a 5 x 5 cm(2) photodiode detector incorporating 48 microm pixels on a CMOS array and a fast gadolinium oxysulfide (GOS) intensifying screen. The microCT system has a flexible C-arm gantry design with adjustable detector positioning, which acquires CT projection images around the common microPET/CT bed. The design and the initial characterization of the microCT system is described, and images of the first mouse scans with microPET/CT scanning protocols are shown.

[1]  S. Lou,et al.  Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in mouse bone marrow tissues after ionizing radiation , 2006, International journal of radiation biology.

[2]  L. Kèlland,et al.  Of mice and men: values and liabilities of the athymic nude mouse model in anticancer drug development. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[3]  S. Kasper,et al.  Genetically modified mice and their use in developing therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Simon R Cherry,et al.  In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[8]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  R. Leahy,et al.  Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  M J Paulus,et al.  High resolution X-ray computed tomography: an emerging tool for small animal cancer research. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[13]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Statistical approaches in quantitative positron emission tomography , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[14]  Myrna E. Watanabe Genes do play a role in obesity , 2002 .

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT. , 2004, Molecular imaging.