What does a slug test measure: An investigation of instrument response and the effects of heterogeneity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Geometry-Imbedded Darcy's Law and Transient Subsurface Flow , 1985 .
[2] T. Narasimhan,et al. An Evaluation of the Bouwer and Rice Method of Slug Test Analysis , 1995 .
[3] J. Jaeger. Conduction of Heat in an Infinite Region Bounded Internally by a Circular Cylinder of a Perfect Conductor , 1956 .
[4] A. J. Desbarats,et al. Spatial averaging of hydraulic conductivity under radial flow conditions , 1994 .
[5] R. Beckie. A comparison of methods to determine measurement support volumes , 2001 .
[6] Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al. Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. , 1985 .
[7] K. Karasaki,et al. Analytical models of slug tests , 1988 .
[8] H. Bouwer,et al. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .
[9] Abraham Sageev,et al. Slug Test Analysis , 1986 .
[10] Albert C. Reynolds,et al. A new analysis procedure for determining aquifer properties from slug test data , 1989 .
[11] A. Dax. A note on the analysis of slug tests , 1987 .
[12] L. Townley,et al. Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Propagation in Numerical Models of Groundwater Flow , 1985 .
[13] J. D. Bredehoeft,et al. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .
[14] Gary R. Chirlin,et al. A Critique of the Hvorslev Method for Slug Test Analysis: The Fully Penetrating Well , 1989 .
[15] Francois Alabert,et al. The practice of fast conditional simulations through the LU decomposition of the covariance matrix , 1987 .
[16] James J. Butler,et al. Slug tests in partially penetrating wells , 1994 .
[17] H. Bouwer. The Bouwer and Rice Slug Test — An Updatea , 1989 .
[18] K. Novakowski. Analysis of pulse interference tests , 1989 .
[19] G. Bohling,et al. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 1. The slugged well , 1995 .
[20] Gordon A. Fenton,et al. Simulation and analysis of random fields , 1990 .
[21] D. Guyonnet,et al. Evaluating the Volume of Porous Medium Investigated During Slug Tests , 1993 .
[22] T. N. Narasimhan,et al. Improved Interpretation of Hvorslev Tests , 1994 .
[23] Gedeon Dagan,et al. A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers , 1978 .
[24] Henry J. Ramey,et al. Analysis of ''Slug Test'' Or DST Flow Period Data , 1975 .
[25] G. Dagan. Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .
[26] Vitaly A. Zlotnik,et al. Interpretation of Slug and Packer Tests in Anisotropic Aquifers , 1994 .
[27] Fred J. Molz,et al. An Analysis Technique for Multilevel and Partially Penetrating Slug Test Data , 1990 .
[28] A. Desbarats. Spatial averaging of transmissivity in heterogeneous fields with flow toward a well , 1992 .
[29] James J. Butler,et al. Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests , 1996 .
[30] M. J. Hvorslev. Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations , 1951 .
[31] J. W. Mercer,et al. Evaluation of Slug Tests in Wells Containing a Finite-Thickness Skin , 1984 .
[32] W. T. Cardwell,et al. Average Permeabilities of Heterogeneous Oil Sands , 1945 .
[33] James J. Butler,et al. Relationship Between Pumping‐Test and Slug‐Test Parameters: Scale Effect or Artifact? , 1998 .
[34] James J. Butler,et al. Slug Tests in Unconfined Formations: An Assessment of the Bouwer and Rice Technique , 1995 .
[35] Nitin S. Pandit,et al. Interpretation of Slug Test Data , 1986 .
[36] T. Gates,et al. Wellbore Skin Effect in Slug‐Test Data Analysis for Low‐Permeability Geologic Materials , 1997 .
[37] James J. Butler,et al. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests Part 2. Observation wells , 1995 .
[38] J. Black,et al. Slug tests in fissured aquifers , 1983 .