Applying findings from a systematic review of workplace-based e-learning: implications for health information professionals.

OBJECTIVES To systematically review the UK published literature on e-learning in the health workplace and to apply the findings to one of the most prolific UK e-learning initiatives in the health sector--the National Library for Health Facilitated Online Learning Interactive Opportunity (FOLIO) Programme. METHODS Sensitive searches were conducted across ASSIA, Australian Education Index, British Education Index, cinahl, CSA Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts, Emerald, ERIC, IBSS, Index to Theses, LISA, MEDLINE, PSYCINFO and Social Science Citation Index. Additional citations were identified from reference lists of included studies and of relevant reviews; citation tracking and contact with experts. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were coded and analysed using thematic analysis as described by Miles & Huberman (Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984). RESULTS Five broad themes were identified from the 29 included studies: (i) peer communication; (ii) flexibility; (iii) support; (iv) knowledge validation; and (v) course presentation and design. These broad themes were supported by a total of eleven sub-themes. Components from the FOLIO Programme were analysed and existing and proposed developments were mapped against each sub-theme. This provides a valuable framework for ongoing course development. CONCLUSION Librarians involved in delivering and supporting e-learning can benefit from applying the findings from the systematic review to existing programmes, exemplified by the FOLIO Programme. The resultant framework can also be used in developing new e-learning programmes.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[2]  S. Turner,et al.  CPD for GPs using the THOR-GP website. , 2007, Occupational medicine.

[3]  M. Grant.  The role of reflection in the library and information sector: a systematic review. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[4]  K. Gresty,et al.  Addressing the issue of e-learning and online genetics for health professionals. , 2007, Nursing & health sciences.

[5]  S. Sutherland,et al.  Graseby MS16A and MS26 syringe drivers: reported effectiveness of an online learning programme. , 2007, International journal of palliative nursing.

[6]  John Sandars,et al.  Online collaborative learning for healthcare continuing professional development: a cross-case analysis of three case studies , 2007, Medical teacher.

[7]  Sue Roberts,et al.  Achieving change through mutual development: supported online learning and the evolving roles of health and information professionals. , 2006, Health information and libraries journal.

[8]  Louise McCabe,et al.  Dementia studies online: reflections on the opportunities and drawbacks of eLearning , 2006 .

[9]  Barbara Allan,et al.  Virtual learning communities as a vehicle for workforce development: a case study , 2006 .

[10]  M. Weaver,et al.  Facilitating online reflective learning for health and social care professionals , 2006 .

[11]  C. Hare,et al.  Safer medicine administration through the use of e-learning. , 2006, Nursing times.

[12]  G. Benfield,et al.  The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice , 2006 .

[13]  Dina Lewis,et al.  A strategic approach to developing e-learning capability for healthcare. , 2005, Health information and libraries journal.

[14]  Andrew Booth,et al.  e-FOLIO: using e-learning to learn about e-learning. , 2005, Health information and libraries journal.

[15]  S. Kinghorn.  Delivering multiprofessional web-based psychosocial education: the lessons learnt. , 2005, International journal of palliative nursing.

[16]  J. Hurst.  Evaluating staff and student experiences of multidisciplinary continuous professional development via distance-learning. , 2005, EDTNA/ERCA journal.

[17]  J. Stephenson,et al.  Using the Internet to Gain Personalized Degrees from Learning through Work , 2005 .

[18]  C. Barratt,et al.  Can the Internet widen participation in reproductive medicine education for professionals? , 2004, Human reproduction.

[19]  J. A. Smith,et al.  The problem of appraising qualitative research , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[20]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J. Bloomfield,et al.  An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[22]  Robert C. Lee,et al.  STANDARD QUALITY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPERS FROM A VARIETY OF FIELDS , 2004 .

[23]  Graham Walton,et al.  The role of library and information services in supporting learning , 2004 .

[24]  A. Booth.  Bridging the Research-Practice Gap? The Role of Evidence Based Librarianship , 2003 .

[25]  A. Booth,et al.  The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[26]  Philippa Levy,et al.  Studying Health Information from a Distance: The Impact of a Multimedia Case Study , 2003, Health Informatics J..

[27]  Kevin Brosnan,et al.  Web based continuing professional development – a learning architecture approach , 2003 .

[28]  D. Cahill,et al.  How Useful are WWW Discussion Boards and Email in Delivering a Case Study Course in Reproductive Medicine , 2003 .

[29]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[30]  Mike Hall,et al.  An evaluation of an online course for medical practitioners , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  Jennifer Sampson,et al.  Critical Appraisal Guidelines for Single Case Study Research , 2002, ECIS.

[32]  Y Needham,et al.  Using the Web to develop an EN conversion course. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[33]  D. Cahill,et al.  Medical education with the Internet: a pilot training programme in reproductive medicine , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[34]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[35]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .