Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.

Six experiments were conducted to determine the circumstances under which an irrelevant singleton captures attention. Subjects searched for a target while ignoring a salient distractor that appeared at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) prior to each search display. Spatial congruency and interference effects were measured. The strategies available to find the target were controlled (only singleton-detection mode, only feature-search mode, or both search strategies available). An irrelevant abrupt onset captured attention in search for a color target, across SOAs, whatever strategies were available. In contrast, in search for a shape target, an irrelevant color singleton captured attention in the singleton-detection condition but delayed response at its location in the feature-search condition, across SOAs. When both strategies were available, capture was short lived (50- to 100-msec SOAs). The theoretical implications of these findings in relation to current views on attentional capture are discussed. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

[1]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[4]  Y Tsal,et al.  A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  K. Hutchison,et al.  Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Can new objects override attentional control settings? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. R. Mounts Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Steven Todd,et al.  Attentional misguidance in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[21]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[24]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .

[26]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing? , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .