What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness

In several industries, new products are very similar in functional features but compete on their unique design. Firms like Alessi, Apple, Bang & Olufsen, Dyson, or Kartell all follow a design-driven innovation approach and use their products' visual appearance as the main mean for differentiation. In spite of this, design newness is never discussed among the dimensions of product innovativeness. Instead, conceptualizations of product innovativeness mostly focus on a product's technical newness or the changes it implies for the innovating firm or for the market it enters. This paper seeks to build an argument for why design newness should be considered as a dimension of product innovativeness. In addition to providing conceptual rationale, empirical evidence is offered on the influence of design newness on sales performance across a product's life cycle. To be able to put the findings into perspective, the performance effects of design newness are compared with those of technical newness. As several products exemplify that design newness and technical newness can go hand in hand, not only direct performance effects but also interaction effects between both newness dimensions are investigated. The arguments are tested on a sample of 157 new cars launched between 1978 and 2006 in Germany. The automobile industry is selected because of the strategic role of both technical and design aspects in product innovation. Putting a focus on this industry also has the advantage that historical information on car specifics and objective sales data over time are accessible. The results emphasize that both design and technical newness are important drivers of car sales. However, the effects differ widely across the product life cycle. While design newness has a positive impact right after the introduction and persists in strength over time, technical newness drives sales with a lagged effect and decreases toward the end of the life cycle. The test of a combined influence of design newness and technical newness on sales performance produces no significant results. These results open interesting avenues for future research on product innovativeness in general and design newness in particular. For management practice, the findings emphasize the importance of overall product innovativeness, clarify the different performance effects of design and technical newness across the product life cycle, and show the value of creating a unique visual product appearance to positively trigger product diffusion.

[1]  Általános társadalom tudományok,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 2011 .

[2]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  Complementing intuition: insights on styling as a strategic tool , 2007 .

[3]  A. Kieser,et al.  Learning to Reduce Interorganizational Learning: An Analysis of Architectural Product Innovation in Strategic Alliances* , 2007 .

[4]  K. Talke.  Corporate mindset of innovating firms: Influences on new product performance , 2007 .

[5]  Austin Henderson,et al.  New & upcoming titles , 2006, INTR.

[6]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success , 2006 .

[7]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be? , 2006 .

[8]  Alan Lewis,et al.  National Product Design Identities , 2005 .

[9]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  The influence of project autonomy on project success , 2005 .

[10]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[11]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry , 2004 .

[12]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Strategic Responses to New Technologies and Their Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Journal of Marketing.

[13]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[14]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Industry , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[18]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[19]  P. Papastathopoulou,et al.  An empirically‐based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios , 2001 .

[20]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[21]  G. McClelland,et al.  Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2001 .

[22]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[23]  G. Tomas M. Hult,et al.  A five‐country study of national identity , 1999 .

[24]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[25]  P. Chao,et al.  Impact of Country-of-Origin Dimensions on Product Quality and Design Quality Perceptions , 1998 .

[26]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Design strategy and competitive advantage , 1998 .

[27]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[28]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation , 1997 .

[29]  A. Griffin.  The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[30]  J. A. Stoop,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[31]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[32]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[33]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[34]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[35]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity , 1993 .

[36]  Robin Roy,et al.  Case studies of creativity in innovative product development , 1993 .

[37]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[38]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[39]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[40]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  The effect of product design activities on commercial success levels of new industrial products , 1989 .

[41]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[42]  R. Reilly,et al.  Automobile styling as a shift variable: an investigation by firm and by industry , 1984 .

[43]  W. Bilkey,et al.  Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations , 1982 .

[44]  T. Whitfield,et al.  The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. , 1979 .

[45]  Murphy A. Sewall.  Market Segmentation Based on Consumer Ratings of Proposed Product Designs , 1978 .

[46]  R. Sherman,et al.  Does Automobile Style Change Payoff , 1971 .

[47]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  Should new products look similar or different?The influence of the market environment on strategic product styling , 2008 .

[48]  Alexander Kock.  Innovativeness and Innovation Success - A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[49]  R. Verganti.  Innovating through design , 2006 .

[50]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance , 2005 .

[51]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[52]  Thomas C. Kohler.  Wirkungen des Produktdesigns , 2003 .

[53]  G. Gemser,et al.  How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance , 2001 .

[54]  R. Clarke,et al.  Hot products , 1999 .

[55]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Association measures as predictors of product originality , 1999 .

[56]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Consumer Resistance to, and Acceptance Of, Innovations , 1999 .

[57]  R. Kieselbach.  The drive to design : Geschichte, Ausbildung und Perspektiven im Autodesign , 1998 .

[58]  Frédéric F. Brunel,et al.  Need Hierarchies in Consumer Judgments of Product Designs: Is It Time to Reconsider Maslow's Theory? , 1996 .

[59]  Robert W. Veryzer.  The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research , 1995 .

[60]  Lawrence L. Garber,et al.  The Package Appearance in Choice , 1995 .