Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes—A Need to Change Perspectives

Due to the high intra-individual variability in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), there may be considerable bias in knowledge about altered neurophysiological processes underlying executive dysfunctions in patients with different ADHD subtypes. When aiming to establish dimensional cognitive-neurophysiological constructs representing symptoms of ADHD as suggested by the initiative for Research Domain Criteria, it is crucial to consider such processes independent of variability. We examined patients with the predominantly inattentive subtype (attention deficit disorder, ADD) and the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD-C) in a flanker task measuring conflict control. Groups were matched for task performance. Besides using classic event-related potential (ERP) techniques and source localization, neurophysiological data was also analyzed using residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) to statistically account for intra-individual variability and S-LORETA to estimate the sources of the activations. The analysis of classic ERPs related to conflict monitoring revealed no differences between patients with ADD and ADHD-C. When individual variability was accounted for, clear differences became apparent in the RIDE C-cluster (analog to the P3 ERP-component). While patients with ADD distinguished between compatible and incompatible flanker trials early on, patients with ADHD-C seemed to employ more cognitive resources overall. These differences are reflected in inferior parietal areas. The study demonstrates differences in neuronal mechanisms related to response selection processes between ADD and ADHD-C which, according to source localization, arise from the inferior parietal cortex. Importantly, these differences could only be detected when accounting for intra-individual variability. The results imply that it is very likely that differences in neurophysiological processes between ADHD subtypes are underestimated and have not been recognized because intra-individual variability in neurophysiological data has not sufficiently been taken into account.

[1]  L. Rohde,et al.  ADHD in children and adults: diagnosis and prognosis. , 2012, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences.

[2]  R. Poldrack.  Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Attention deficit and impulsivity: selecting, shifting, and stopping. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  R. Klein,et al.  Interference Control in Children with and without ADHD: A Systematic Review of Flanker and Simon Task Performance , 2009, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[5]  A. Hahne,et al.  Improvements of sensorimotor processes during action cascading associated with changes in sensory processing architecture–insights from sensory deprivation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  R. Poldrack.  Inferring Mental States from Neuroimaging Data: From Reverse Inference to Large-Scale Decoding , 2011, Neuron.

[7]  K. Kerns,et al.  Cognitive Control in Children with ADHD-C: How efficient are they? , 2009, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[8]  V. Roessner,et al.  Specific cognitive–neurophysiological processes predict impulsivity in the childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined subtype , 2016, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  C. Beste,et al.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour , 2015, Nature Communications.

[11]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neuropeptide S receptor (NPSR1) gene variation modulates response inhibition and error monitoring , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Christian Beste,et al.  Intact Context-Dependent Modulation of Conflict Monitoring in Childhood ADHD , 2020, Journal of attention disorders.

[15]  Christoph Klein,et al.  Increased reaction time variability in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a response-related phenomenon: evidence from single-trial event-related potentials. , 2015, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  S. Houghton,et al.  Differential Patterns of Executive Function in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder According to Gender and Subtype , 1999, Journal of child neurology.

[17]  P L Nunez,et al.  The Spline‐Laplacian in Clinical Neurophysiology: A Method to Improve EEG Spatial Resolution , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[18]  Jiajin Yuan,et al.  Feedback-Related Negativity in Children with Two Subtypes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  F. Rothhammer,et al.  Intra-Individual Response Variability Assessed by Ex-Gaussian Analysis may be a New Endophenotype for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[20]  J. Nigg,et al.  Neuropsychological performance and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes and symptom dimensions. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[21]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence for the enhancement of cognitive control under dorsal pallidal deep brain stimulation in Huntington’s disease , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[22]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[24]  C. Beste,et al.  Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  T. Insel,et al.  Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Charles A . Sanislow , Ph . D . 2010 Research Domain Criteria ( RDoC ) : Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders , 2018 .

[26]  Dirk J. Heslenfeld,et al.  Adaptive control deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The role of error processing , 2007, Psychiatry Research.

[27]  Werner Sommer,et al.  A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)—A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Simon H. Kohl,et al.  The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[30]  Suhong Wang,et al.  Interference control in 6–11 year-old children with and without ADHD: behavioral and ERP study , 2013, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[31]  Christian Beste,et al.  The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control – Evidence from EEG and pupillary responses , 2017, NeuroImage.

[32]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[33]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Individual differences in response conflict adaptations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[34]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Perceptual and response interference in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and the effects of methylphenidate. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[35]  T. Banaschewski,et al.  Action Monitoring in Boys With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Their Nonaffected Siblings, and Normal Control Subjects: Evidence for an Endophenotype , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  V. Roessner,et al.  Expectancy effects during response selection modulate attentional selection and inhibitory control networks , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  P. Ohrmann,et al.  Deficient interference control during working memory updating in adults with ADHD: An event-related potential study , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Barkley.  Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  M. Döpfner,et al.  Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV (DISYPS-KJ) , 2000 .

[41]  M. Falkenstein,et al.  Functional 5‐HT1a receptor polymorphism selectively modulates error‐specific subprocesses of performance monitoring , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[42]  M. Fillmore,et al.  Constraints on information processing capacity in adults with ADHD. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[43]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .

[44]  Stuart J. Johnstone,et al.  Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/Nogo task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[45]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Classifying adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on functional and structural imaging , 2015, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[46]  G. Mangun,et al.  Differential Oscillatory Electroencephalogram Between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Subtypes and Typically Developing Adolescents , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[47]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[48]  R. Chan,et al.  ADHD subtypes and neuropsychological performance in an adult sample. , 2016, Research in developmental disabilities.

[49]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[50]  M. Mohammadi,et al.  Birth Order and Sibling Gender Ratio of a Clinical Sample Neurocognitive Profile of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (adhd): a Comparison between Subtypes , 2022 .

[51]  S. Gau,et al.  Intra‐individual reaction time variability based on ex‐Gaussian distribution as a potential endophenotype for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2015, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[52]  A. Ghanizadeh,et al.  Predictors of Different Types of Developmental Coordination Problems in ADHD: The Effect of Age, Gender, ADHD Symptom Severity and Comorbidities , 2010, Neuropediatrics.

[53]  G. Bush,et al.  Atomoxetine increases fronto-parietal functional MRI activation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A pilot study , 2013, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[54]  V. Roessner,et al.  Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different , 2017, Scientific Reports.