Evaluation of Acoustic Imaging System Using Correlation Division in Synthetic Transmit Aperture with Multicarrier Signals

This paper presents and evaluates a new acoustic imaging system that uses multicarrier signals for correlation division in synthetic transmit aperture (CD-STA). CD-STA is a method that transmits uncorrelated signals from different transducers simultaneously to achieve high-speed and high-resolution acoustic imaging. In CD-STA, autocorrelations and cross-correlations in transmitted signals must be suppressed because they cause artifacts in the resulting images, which narrow the dynamic range as a consequence. To suppress the correlation noise, we had proposed to use multicarrier signals optimized by a genetic algorithm. Because the evaluation of our proposed method was very limited in the previous reports, we analyzed it more deeply in this paper. We optimized three pairs of multicarrier waveforms of various lengths, which correspond to 5th-, 6th- and 7th-order M-sequence signals, respectively. We built a CD-STA imaging system that operates in air. Using the system, we conducted imaging experiments to evaluate the image quality and resolution of the multicarrier signals. We also investigated the ability of the proposed method to resolve both positions and velocities of target scatterers. For that purpose, we carried out an experiment, in which both moving and fixed targets were visualized by our system. As a result of the experiments, we confirmed that the multicarrier signals have lower artifact levels, better axial resolution, and greater tolerance to velocity mismatch than M-sequence signals, particularly for short signals.

[1]  S.W. Smith,et al.  High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. I. Transducer design and beam steering , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  J. Jensen,et al.  Multielement synthetic transmit aperture imaging using temporal encoding , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Coded excitation for diagnostic ultrasound: a system developer's perspective , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Masahide Yoneyama,et al.  An ultrasonic visual sensor for three-dimensional object recognition using neural networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  M.B. Pursley,et al.  Crosscorrelation properties of pseudorandom and related sequences , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  T. Someya,et al.  Large-Area Flexible Ultrasonic Imaging System With an Organic Transistor Active Matrix , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[7]  E.S. Ebbini,et al.  A new coded-excitation ultrasound imaging system. I. Basic principles , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  T. Misaridis,et al.  Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part III: high frame rate imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Optimizing the radiation pattern of sparse periodic linear arrays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Norio Ishii,et al.  Evaluation of high-speed 3D imaging system which utilizes coded wavefront , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[11]  Svetoslav Ivanov Nikolov,et al.  Comparison between different encoding schemes for synthetic aperture imaging , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Luis Castedo,et al.  Semiblind space-time decoding in wireless communications: a maximum likelihood approach , 2002, Signal Process..

[13]  Yasutaka Tamura,et al.  Three-Dimensional Imaging System Using Ultrasonic Encoded Wavefront —High Speed Computation and Array Geometry , 1999 .

[14]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  F. Gran,et al.  Frequency division transmission imaging and synthetic aperture reconstruction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  P. van Genderen,et al.  Solving Doppler ambiguity by Doppler sensitive pulse compression using multi-carrier waveform , 2008, 2008 European Radar Conference.

[17]  Jules S. Jaffe,et al.  Code design and performance characterization for code multiplexed imaging , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[18]  L. G. Weiss Wavelets and wideband correlation processing , 1994, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  Abdelhak M. Zoubir,et al.  Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging in Air using a 2D Array on a Fixed Platform , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[20]  J.A. Jensen,et al.  Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: basic concepts and expected benefits , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Synthetic transmit aperture imaging using orthogonal Golay coded excitation , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[22]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation for synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Vera Behar,et al.  Optimization of sparse synthetic transmit aperture imaging with coded excitation and frequency division. , 2005, Ultrasonics.